Female unemployment — all countries

Female unemployment — Georgia

Female unemployment in Georgia in 2025 — 10.66%. Ranked 140 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 8.1 pp.

2025 10.66% +0.47 pp vs 2024
World rank 140of 182
Period maximum 19.17%2009
Period minimum 2.56%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of female labor force

Female unemployment — Georgia, 1991–20250510152019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 2.56%1992: 5.12%1993: 5.12%1994: 7.97%1995: 7.21%1996: 10.91%1997: 10.9%1998: 13.77%1999: 12.25%2000: 10.53%2001: 10.68%2002: 11.11%2003: 11.54%2004: 11.81%2005: 12.73%2006: 11.75%2007: 12.6%2008: 17.61%2009: 19.17%2010: 17.68%2011: 17.49%2012: 18.41%2013: 16.33%2014: 14.6%2015: 14.02%2016: 12.74%2017: 12.77%2018: 11.25%2019: 10.17%2020: 10.25%2021: 10.3%2022: 10.24%2023: 10.18%2024: 10.19%2025: 10.66%
Change over the period: +8.1 pp Annual average: 0.24 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Georgia

Georgia 10.66%
World 4.94%
Western Asia computed 14.26%
Female unemployment — Georgia, by year Georgia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 10.66 +0.47 pp
2024 10.19 +0.01 pp
2023 10.18 −0.06 pp
2022 10.24 −0.06 pp
2021 10.3 +0.05 pp
2020 10.25 +0.07 pp
2019 10.17 −1.08 pp
2018 11.25 −1.51 pp
2017 12.77 +0.03 pp
2016 12.74 −1.28 pp
2015 14.02 −0.58 pp
2014 14.6 −1.73 pp
2013 16.33 −2.08 pp
2012 18.41 +0.93 pp
2011 17.49 −0.2 pp
2010 17.68 −1.49 pp
2009 19.17 +1.56 pp
2008 17.61 +5.01 pp
2007 12.6 +0.85 pp
2006 11.75 −0.98 pp
2005 12.73 +0.92 pp
2004 11.81 +0.27 pp
2003 11.54 +0.43 pp
2002 11.11 +0.43 pp
2001 10.68 +0.15 pp
2000 10.53 −1.72 pp
1999 12.25 −1.53 pp
1998 13.77 +2.87 pp
1997 10.9 −0 pp
1996 10.91 +3.7 pp
1995 7.21 −0.76 pp
1994 7.97 +2.85 pp
1993 5.12 +0 pp
1992 5.12 +2.56 pp
1991 2.56

About the indicator

The share of the female labor force that is unemployed. The gap with male unemployment reflects both the structure of labor demand and the barriers women face in reaching employment. In some countries the indicator looks favorable only because many women are outside the labor force altogether — it should be read alongside female labor force participation.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.