Female labor force participation rate — all countries

Female labor force participation rate — OECD

Female labor force participation rate in the OECD in 2025 — 53.28%. Since 1990, the indicator has risen by 5.32 pp.

2025 53.28% −0.11 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 53.39%2024
Period minimum 47.96%1990

Trend over time

1990–2025 · % of women aged 15+

Female labor force participation rate — OECD, 1990–2025464850525419901994199820022006201020142018202220251990: 47.96%1991: 48.24%1992: 48.25%1993: 47.99%1994: 48.52%1995: 48.67%1996: 48.87%1997: 49.2%1998: 49.19%1999: 49.36%2000: 49.38%2001: 49.36%2002: 49.49%2003: 49.64%2004: 49.61%2005: 49.89%2006: 50.21%2007: 50.32%2008: 50.55%2009: 50.8%2010: 50.82%2011: 50.92%2012: 51.2%2013: 51.3%2014: 51.27%2015: 51.37%2016: 51.62%2017: 51.9%2018: 52.17%2019: 52.56%2020: 51.27%2021: 51.98%2022: 52.66%2023: 53.25%2024: 53.39%2025: 53.28%
Change over the period: +5.32 pp Annual average: 0.15 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: OECD

OECD 53.28%
World 48.94%
Female labor force participation rate — OECD, by year OECD All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 53.28 −0.11 pp
2024 53.39 +0.15 pp
2023 53.25 +0.58 pp
2022 52.66 +0.68 pp
2021 51.98 +0.71 pp
2020 51.27 −1.29 pp
2019 52.56 +0.39 pp
2018 52.17 +0.27 pp
2017 51.9 +0.28 pp
2016 51.62 +0.25 pp
2015 51.37 +0.1 pp
2014 51.27 −0.03 pp
2013 51.3 +0.1 pp
2012 51.2 +0.28 pp
2011 50.92 +0.1 pp
2010 50.82 +0.01 pp
2009 50.8 +0.26 pp
2008 50.55 +0.23 pp
2007 50.32 +0.1 pp
2006 50.21 +0.33 pp
2005 49.89 +0.27 pp
2004 49.61 −0.02 pp
2003 49.64 +0.15 pp
2002 49.49 +0.12 pp
2001 49.36 −0.02 pp
2000 49.38 +0.02 pp
1999 49.36 +0.17 pp
1998 49.19 −0.01 pp
1997 49.2 +0.32 pp
1996 48.87 +0.21 pp
1995 48.67 +0.14 pp
1994 48.52 +0.53 pp
1993 47.99 −0.26 pp
1992 48.25 +0.01 pp
1991 48.24 +0.28 pp
1990 47.96

About the indicator

The share of women aged 15 and over who belong to the labor force. The spread across countries runs from under 10% to over 80%, and it is one of the strongest dividing lines between socioeconomic models. Historically the rate rose together with falling fertility and wider access to education.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.