Female labor force participation rate — all countries

Female labor force participation rate — NATO

Female labor force participation rate in NATO in 2025 — 52.77%. Since 1990, the indicator has risen by 4.24 pp.

2025 52.77% −0.18 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 52.95%2024
Period minimum 48.33%1993

Trend over time

1990–2025 · % of women aged 15+

Female labor force participation rate — NATO, 1990–20254850525419901994199820022006201020142018202220251990: 48.53%1991: 48.84%1992: 48.79%1993: 48.33%1994: 49%1995: 49.03%1996: 49.22%1997: 49.39%1998: 49.57%1999: 49.97%2000: 49.89%2001: 49.94%2002: 50.2%2003: 50.32%2004: 50.12%2005: 50.35%2006: 50.66%2007: 50.78%2008: 51.09%2009: 51.17%2010: 51.25%2011: 51.3%2012: 51.48%2013: 51.51%2014: 51.46%2015: 51.51%2016: 51.74%2017: 52.06%2018: 52.2%2019: 52.46%2020: 51.39%2021: 51.86%2022: 52.47%2023: 52.91%2024: 52.95%2025: 52.77%
Change over the period: +4.24 pp Annual average: 0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: NATO

NATO 52.77%
World 48.94%
Female labor force participation rate — NATO, by year NATO All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 52.77 −0.18 pp
2024 52.95 +0.04 pp
2023 52.91 +0.44 pp
2022 52.47 +0.6 pp
2021 51.86 +0.47 pp
2020 51.39 −1.07 pp
2019 52.46 +0.26 pp
2018 52.2 +0.13 pp
2017 52.06 +0.32 pp
2016 51.74 +0.23 pp
2015 51.51 +0.05 pp
2014 51.46 −0.05 pp
2013 51.51 +0.03 pp
2012 51.48 +0.17 pp
2011 51.3 +0.05 pp
2010 51.25 +0.08 pp
2009 51.17 +0.08 pp
2008 51.09 +0.31 pp
2007 50.78 +0.12 pp
2006 50.66 +0.31 pp
2005 50.35 +0.23 pp
2004 50.12 −0.2 pp
2003 50.32 +0.11 pp
2002 50.2 +0.26 pp
2001 49.94 +0.05 pp
2000 49.89 −0.07 pp
1999 49.97 +0.39 pp
1998 49.57 +0.19 pp
1997 49.39 +0.16 pp
1996 49.22 +0.19 pp
1995 49.03 +0.03 pp
1994 49 +0.67 pp
1993 48.33 −0.45 pp
1992 48.79 −0.05 pp
1991 48.84 +0.31 pp
1990 48.53

About the indicator

The share of women aged 15 and over who belong to the labor force. The spread across countries runs from under 10% to over 80%, and it is one of the strongest dividing lines between socioeconomic models. Historically the rate rose together with falling fertility and wider access to education.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.