Employment in agriculture — all countries

Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste

Employment in agriculture in Timor-Leste in 2025 — 46%. Ranked 26 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 13.7 pp.

2025 46% −0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank 26of 182
Period maximum 59.7%1991
Period minimum 37.8%2021

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste, 1991–20253040506019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 59.7%1992: 59%1993: 58.4%1994: 57.8%1995: 57.3%1996: 56.8%1997: 56.6%1998: 57%1999: 56.4%2000: 54.5%2001: 53.3%2002: 54.2%2003: 54.5%2004: 54.7%2005: 54.2%2006: 54.7%2007: 53.7%2008: 52.6%2009: 51.1%2010: 50.8%2011: 49.5%2012: 48.8%2013: 48%2014: 46.7%2015: 45.4%2016: 44.1%2017: 43.8%2018: 43.1%2019: 39.8%2020: 39.4%2021: 37.8%2022: 48.3%2023: 48.4%2024: 46.3%2025: 46%
Change over the period: −13.7 pp Annual average: -0.4 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Timor-Leste

Timor-Leste 46%
World 25.8%
South-Eastern Asia computed 26.6%
Employment in agriculture — Timor-Leste, by year Timor-Leste All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 46 −0.3 pp
2024 46.3 −2 pp
2023 48.4 +0.1 pp
2022 48.3 +10.4 pp
2021 37.8 −1.5 pp
2020 39.4 −0.4 pp
2019 39.8 −3.3 pp
2018 43.1 −0.7 pp
2017 43.8 −0.4 pp
2016 44.1 −1.3 pp
2015 45.4 −1.3 pp
2014 46.7 −1.3 pp
2013 48 −0.8 pp
2012 48.8 −0.7 pp
2011 49.5 −1.2 pp
2010 50.8 −0.3 pp
2009 51.1 −1.5 pp
2008 52.6 −1 pp
2007 53.7 −1.1 pp
2006 54.7 +0.5 pp
2005 54.2 −0.5 pp
2004 54.7 +0.1 pp
2003 54.5 +0.3 pp
2002 54.2 +0.9 pp
2001 53.3 −1.2 pp
2000 54.5 −1.9 pp
1999 56.4 −0.5 pp
1998 57 +0.3 pp
1997 56.6 −0.1 pp
1996 56.8 −0.6 pp
1995 57.3 −0.5 pp
1994 57.8 −0.6 pp
1993 58.4 −0.6 pp
1992 59 −0.7 pp
1991 59.7

About the indicator

The share of total employment in agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing. Set against the share of agriculture in GDP it shows the productivity of the sector: if farming employs 50% of workers and produces 20% of GDP, labor productivity there is three times below the average for the economy.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.