Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Sierra Leone

Government health expenditure per capita in Sierra Leone in 2023 — 6 US$. Ranked 180 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 219.6%.

2023 6 US$ −20.1% vs 2022
World rank 180of 191
Period maximum 10 US$2021
Period minimum 2 US$2000

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Sierra Leone, 2000–20230510152000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 2 US$2001: 2 US$2002: 3 US$2003: 3 US$2004: 3 US$2005: 3 US$2006: 3 US$2007: 3 US$2008: 3 US$2009: 4 US$2010: 5 US$2011: 5 US$2012: 6 US$2013: 6 US$2014: 10 US$2015: 8 US$2016: 6 US$2017: 4 US$2018: 4 US$2019: 7 US$2020: 7 US$2021: 10 US$2022: 7 US$2023: 6 US$
Change over the period: +4 (+219.62%) Average annual rate: 5.18 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Sierra Leone

Sierra Leone 6 US$
World 804 US$
Western Africa computed 15 US$
Low-income countries computed 7 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Sierra Leone, by year Sierra Leone All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 6 −2 −20.1%
2022 7 −3 −26.36%
2021 10 +3 +45.08%
2020 7 +0 +6.9%
2019 7 +2 +57.63%
2018 4 −0 −3.09%
2017 4 −1 −22.88%
2016 6 −2 −28.41%
2015 8 −2 −20.36%
2014 10 +4 +65.1%
2013 6 +0 +5.35%
2012 6 +0 +5.73%
2011 5 −0 −2.8%
2010 5 +1 +37.47%
2009 4 +1 +30.95%
2008 3 +0 +14.35%
2007 3 −0 −12.77%
2006 3 +0 +3.04%
2005 3 +0 +10.42%
2004 3 −0 −2.75%
2003 3 −0 −0.2%
2002 3 +0 +13.74%
2001 2 +1 +29.34%
2000 2

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.