Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Papua New Guinea

Government health expenditure per capita in Papua New Guinea in 2023 — 62 US$. Ranked 136 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 292.7%.

2023 62 US$ +31.41% vs 2022
World rank 136of 191
Period maximum 62 US$2023
Period minimum 13 US$2003

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Papua New Guinea, 2000–20230204060802000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 16 US$2001: 13 US$2002: 13 US$2003: 13 US$2004: 17 US$2005: 18 US$2006: 20 US$2007: 22 US$2008: 25 US$2009: 24 US$2010: 24 US$2011: 34 US$2012: 48 US$2013: 51 US$2014: 55 US$2015: 34 US$2016: 39 US$2017: 42 US$2018: 41 US$2019: 35 US$2020: 38 US$2021: 31 US$2022: 47 US$2023: 62 US$
Change over the period: +46 (+292.71%) Average annual rate: 6.13 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea 62 US$
World 804 US$
Melanesia computed 71 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Papua New Guinea, by year Papua New Guinea All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 62 +15 +31.41%
2022 47 +17 +55.56%
2021 31 −8 −20.62%
2020 38 +4 +10.03%
2019 35 −7 −15.72%
2018 41 −0 −0.51%
2017 42 +3 +7.19%
2016 39 +5 +13.54%
2015 34 −21 −37.79%
2014 55 +4 +8.28%
2013 51 +3 +5.84%
2012 48 +14 +40.16%
2011 34 +10 +41.12%
2010 24 −0 −0.61%
2009 24 −0 −0.72%
2008 25 +2 +9.81%
2007 22 +2 +11.08%
2006 20 +2 +11.36%
2005 18 +1 +7.37%
2004 17 +4 +32.06%
2003 13 −0 −2.24%
2002 13 −0 −0.95%
2001 13 −3 −16.95%
2000 16

Melanesia, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.