Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Namibia

Government health expenditure per capita in Namibia in 2023 — 232 US$. Ranked 97 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 90.9%.

2023 232 US$ −8.01% vs 2022
World rank 97of 191
Period maximum 295 US$2011
Period minimum 106 US$2002

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Namibia, 2000–20231001502002503002000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 122 US$2001: 110 US$2002: 106 US$2003: 157 US$2004: 195 US$2005: 195 US$2006: 195 US$2007: 233 US$2008: 203 US$2009: 183 US$2010: 261 US$2011: 295 US$2012: 286 US$2013: 278 US$2014: 269 US$2015: 258 US$2016: 253 US$2017: 275 US$2018: 274 US$2019: 249 US$2020: 253 US$2021: 288 US$2022: 253 US$2023: 232 US$
Change over the period: +111 (+90.91%) Average annual rate: 2.85 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Namibia

Namibia 232 US$
World 804 US$
Southern Africa computed 316 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Namibia, by year Namibia All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 232 −20 −8.01%
2022 253 −35 −12.2%
2021 288 +35 +13.86%
2020 253 +3 +1.34%
2019 249 −25 −9.02%
2018 274 −1 −0.2%
2017 275 +21 +8.37%
2016 253 −4 −1.61%
2015 258 −11 −4.26%
2014 269 −9 −3.36%
2013 278 −7 −2.58%
2012 286 −9 −2.99%
2011 295 +34 +12.93%
2010 261 +78 +42.35%
2009 183 −20 −9.75%
2008 203 −30 −12.86%
2007 233 +38 +19.28%
2006 195 +0 +0.18%
2005 195 −1 −0.27%
2004 195 +38 +24.31%
2003 157 +51 +48.03%
2002 106 −4 −3.74%
2001 110 −11 −9.33%
2000 122

Southern Africa, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.