Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Equatorial Guinea

Government health expenditure per capita in Equatorial Guinea in 2023 — 75 US$. Ranked 130 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 774.7%.

2023 75 US$ +14.46% vs 2022
World rank 130of 191
Period maximum 122 US$2012
Period minimum 9 US$2000

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Equatorial Guinea, 2000–20230501001502000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 9 US$2001: 9 US$2002: 9 US$2003: 18 US$2004: 23 US$2005: 35 US$2006: 47 US$2007: 61 US$2008: 88 US$2009: 102 US$2010: 89 US$2011: 102 US$2012: 122 US$2013: 101 US$2014: 101 US$2015: 67 US$2016: 64 US$2017: 62 US$2018: 67 US$2019: 55 US$2020: 60 US$2021: 79 US$2022: 66 US$2023: 75 US$
Change over the period: +67 (+774.68%) Average annual rate: 9.89 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Equatorial Guinea

Equatorial Guinea 75 US$
World 804 US$
Middle Africa computed 15 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Equatorial Guinea, by year Equatorial Guinea All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 75 +10 +14.46%
2022 66 −14 −17.13%
2021 79 +20 +33.34%
2020 60 +5 +8.79%
2019 55 −12 −18.34%
2018 67 +5 +8.73%
2017 62 −3 −4.34%
2016 64 −3 −4.32%
2015 67 −34 −33.42%
2014 101 +1 +0.5%
2013 101 −21 −17.17%
2012 122 +20 +19.38%
2011 102 +13 +15.1%
2010 89 −14 −13.39%
2009 102 +14 +15.57%
2008 88 +28 +45.6%
2007 61 +14 +30.12%
2006 47 +12 +34.68%
2005 35 +11 +48.64%
2004 23 +6 +33.05%
2003 18 +8 +87.55%
2002 9 +1 +6.83%
2001 9 +0 +1.51%
2000 9

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.