Government health expenditure per capita — all countries

Government health expenditure per capita — Belarus

Government health expenditure per capita in Belarus in 2023 — 373 US$. Ranked 76 in the world out of 191. Since 2000, the indicator has risen by 730.6%.

2023 373 US$ +4.27% vs 2022
World rank 76of 191
Period maximum 373 US$2023
Period minimum 45 US$2000

Trend over time

2000–2023 · US$ per capita

Government health expenditure per capita — Belarus, 2000–202301002003004002000200320062009201220152018202120232000: 45 US$2001: 55 US$2002: 62 US$2003: 82 US$2004: 108 US$2005: 146 US$2006: 159 US$2007: 196 US$2008: 230 US$2009: 186 US$2010: 232 US$2011: 201 US$2012: 239 US$2013: 285 US$2014: 281 US$2015: 219 US$2016: 211 US$2017: 229 US$2018: 247 US$2019: 282 US$2020: 298 US$2021: 359 US$2022: 357 US$2023: 373 US$
Change over the period: +328 (+730.65%) Average annual rate: 9.64 %

Comparison, 2023

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Belarus

Belarus 373 US$
World 804 US$
Eastern Europe computed 872 US$
Government health expenditure per capita — Belarus, by year Belarus All countries CSV XLSX
Year US$ Change Change, %
2023 373 +15 +4.27%
2022 357 −2 −0.53%
2021 359 +61 +20.56%
2020 298 +16 +5.83%
2019 282 +35 +14.03%
2018 247 +18 +7.65%
2017 229 +19 +8.9%
2016 211 −9 −3.98%
2015 219 −61 −21.82%
2014 281 −4 −1.46%
2013 285 +46 +19.14%
2012 239 +38 +18.71%
2011 201 −31 −13.25%
2010 232 +46 +24.64%
2009 186 −43 −18.86%
2008 230 +34 +17.37%
2007 196 +37 +23.36%
2006 159 +12 +8.49%
2005 146 +38 +35.13%
2004 108 +26 +31.13%
2003 82 +20 +32.24%
2002 62 +8 +13.91%
2001 55 +10 +22.02%
2000 45

Eastern Europe, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

Government spending on health in current US dollars per person. Of all the spending indicators this one separates countries the most: the gap between the top and the bottom of the table exceeds a factor of a thousand, whereas by share of GDP it is rarely more than fivefold. The reason is simple — the share is taken from economies of very different size.

Important: Converted at the market exchange rate rather than by purchasing power: the real volume of medical care one dollar buys in low-income countries is markedly larger, so the gap in the table overstates the gap in services.

Source: Global Health Observatory (WHO), license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.