Deposit interest rate — all countries

Deposit interest rate — South Korea

Deposit interest rate in South Korea in 2025 — 2.73%. Ranked 37 in the world out of 70. Since 1996, the indicator has fallen by 7.37 pp.

2025 2.73% −0.75 pp vs 2024
World rank 37of 70
Period maximum 13.29%1998
Period minimum 1.16%2020

Trend over time

1996–2025 · % per annum

Deposit interest rate — South Korea, 1996–2025051015199619992002200520082011201420172020202320251996: 10.11%1997: 10.81%1998: 13.29%1999: 7.95%2000: 7.94%2001: 5.79%2002: 4.95%2003: 4.25%2004: 3.87%2005: 3.72%2006: 4.5%2007: 5.17%2008: 5.87%2009: 3.48%2010: 3.86%2011: 4.15%2012: 3.7%2013: 2.89%2014: 2.54%2015: 1.81%2016: 1.56%2017: 1.67%2018: 2.03%2019: 1.85%2020: 1.16%2021: 1.2%2022: 3.12%2023: 3.84%2024: 3.48%2025: 2.73%
Change over the period: −7.37 pp Annual average: -0.25 pp
Deposit interest rate — South Korea, by year South Korea All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 2.73 −0.75 pp
2024 3.48 −0.36 pp
2023 3.84 +0.72 pp
2022 3.12 +1.93 pp
2021 1.2 +0.04 pp
2020 1.16 −0.69 pp
2019 1.85 −0.17 pp
2018 2.03 +0.36 pp
2017 1.67 +0.11 pp
2016 1.56 −0.25 pp
2015 1.81 −0.73 pp
2014 2.54 −0.36 pp
2013 2.89 −0.81 pp
2012 3.7 −0.45 pp
2011 4.15 +0.3 pp
2010 3.86 +0.37 pp
2009 3.48 −2.39 pp
2008 5.87 +0.7 pp
2007 5.17 +0.67 pp
2006 4.5 +0.78 pp
2005 3.72 −0.15 pp
2004 3.87 −0.38 pp
2003 4.25 −0.7 pp
2002 4.95 −0.84 pp
2001 5.79 −2.15 pp
2000 7.94 −0.01 pp
1999 7.95 −5.34 pp
1998 13.29 +2.48 pp
1997 10.81 +0.7 pp
1996 10.11

Eastern Asia, 2025

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The average rate banks pay on time deposits of residents. Set against inflation it shows whether savings keep their purchasing power: if the deposit rate is below inflation, the real return on deposits is negative.

Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct weight is the volume of deposits, and we have no such series. Adding rates without weights is meaningless: the rate of a country with a tiny banking system would weigh as much as that of a large one.

Source: World Economic Outlook (IMF), license IMF open data.