Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Zambia

Bank branches in Zambia in 2024 — 2.51 per 100k. Ranked 147 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 19.4%.

2024 2.51 per 100k −3.6% vs 2023
World rank 147of 153
Period maximum 4.59 per 100k2014
Period minimum 2.51 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Zambia, 2004–20242345200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 3.11 per 100k2005: 2.95 per 100k2006: 2.97 per 100k2007: 3.22 per 100k2008: 3.54 per 100k2009: 3.68 per 100k2010: 3.78 per 100k2011: 3.92 per 100k2012: 4.13 per 100k2013: 4.35 per 100k2014: 4.59 per 100k2015: 4.56 per 100k2016: 4.57 per 100k2017: 4.4 per 100k2018: 3.73 per 100k2019: 3.13 per 100k2020: 3.01 per 100k2021: 2.74 per 100k2022: 2.66 per 100k2023: 2.6 per 100k2024: 2.51 per 100k
Change over the period: −0.6 (−19.38%) Average annual rate: -1.07 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Zambia

Zambia 2.51 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Sub-Saharan Africa 4.01 per 100k
Eastern Africa computed 3.14 per 100k
Lower-middle-income countries computed 11.99 per 100k
Bank branches — Zambia, by year Zambia All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 2.51 −0.09 −3.6%
2023 2.6 −0.06 −2.32%
2022 2.66 −0.08 −2.87%
2021 2.74 −0.27 −8.87%
2020 3.01 −0.12 −3.88%
2019 3.13 −0.59 −15.96%
2018 3.73 −0.68 −15.36%
2017 4.4 −0.17 −3.63%
2016 4.57 +0.01 +0.15%
2015 4.56 −0.03 −0.67%
2014 4.59 +0.24 +5.43%
2013 4.35 +0.23 +5.46%
2012 4.13 +0.21 +5.37%
2011 3.92 +0.14 +3.58%
2010 3.78 +0.1 +2.79%
2009 3.68 +0.14 +4.02%
2008 3.54 +0.32 +10.05%
2007 3.22 +0.25 +8.33%
2006 2.97 +0.02 +0.53%
2005 2.95 −0.16 −5.09%
2004 3.11

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.