Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Slovenia

Bank branches in Slovenia in 2024 — 18.58 per 100k. Ranked 42 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 54.8%.

2024 18.58 per 100k −10.61% vs 2023
World rank 42of 153
Period maximum 41.11 per 100k2004
Period minimum 18.58 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Slovenia, 2004–20241020304050200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 41.11 per 100k2005: 40.23 per 100k2006: 39.79 per 100k2007: 40.31 per 100k2008: 39.44 per 100k2009: 39.64 per 100k2010: 38.83 per 100k2011: 38.36 per 100k2012: 38.51 per 100k2013: 34.49 per 100k2014: 31.9 per 100k2015: 31.24 per 100k2016: 30.68 per 100k2017: 29.5 per 100k2018: 27.94 per 100k2019: 27.47 per 100k2020: 24.66 per 100k2021: 22.59 per 100k2022: 21.41 per 100k2023: 20.79 per 100k2024: 18.58 per 100k
Change over the period: −22.53 (−54.8%) Average annual rate: -3.89 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Slovenia

Slovenia 18.58 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Southern Europe computed 28.5 per 100k
Bank branches — Slovenia, by year Slovenia All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 18.58 −2.21 −10.61%
2023 20.79 −0.63 −2.92%
2022 21.41 −1.18 −5.2%
2021 22.59 −2.07 −8.4%
2020 24.66 −2.81 −10.22%
2019 27.47 −0.47 −1.68%
2018 27.94 −1.56 −5.28%
2017 29.5 −1.18 −3.85%
2016 30.68 −0.56 −1.79%
2015 31.24 −0.66 −2.08%
2014 31.9 −2.59 −7.52%
2013 34.49 −4.02 −10.44%
2012 38.51 +0.15 +0.4%
2011 38.36 −0.47 −1.22%
2010 38.83 −0.81 −2.04%
2009 39.64 +0.19 +0.49%
2008 39.44 −0.87 −2.16%
2007 40.31 +0.52 +1.32%
2006 39.79 −0.45 −1.11%
2005 40.23 −0.88 −2.15%
2004 41.11

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.