Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — San Marino

Bank branches in San Marino in 2024 — 120.76 per 100k. Ranked 1 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 48%.

2024 120.76 per 100k −0.84% vs 2023
World rank 1of 153
Period maximum 276.28 per 100k2007
Period minimum 120.76 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — San Marino, 2004–2024100150200250300200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 232.26 per 100k2005: 253.13 per 100k2006: 269.91 per 100k2007: 276.28 per 100k2008: 272.39 per 100k2009: 260.82 per 100k2010: 259.25 per 100k2011: 249.73 per 100k2012: 246.58 per 100k2013: 246.07 per 100k2014: 237.98 per 100k2015: 228.67 per 100k2016: 223.05 per 100k2017: 186.39 per 100k2018: 175.18 per 100k2019: 137.02 per 100k2020: 129.52 per 100k2021: 121.1 per 100k2022: 122.65 per 100k2023: 121.78 per 100k2024: 120.76 per 100k
Change over the period: −111.5 (−48.01%) Average annual rate: -3.22 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: San Marino

San Marino 120.76 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Southern Europe computed 28.5 per 100k
Bank branches — San Marino, by year San Marino All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 120.76 −1.03 −0.84%
2023 121.78 −0.86 −0.7%
2022 122.65 +1.55 +1.28%
2021 121.1 −8.42 −6.5%
2020 129.52 −7.5 −5.48%
2019 137.02 −38.16 −21.78%
2018 175.18 −11.21 −6.02%
2017 186.39 −36.66 −16.43%
2016 223.05 −5.62 −2.46%
2015 228.67 −9.31 −3.91%
2014 237.98 −8.08 −3.29%
2013 246.07 −0.51 −0.21%
2012 246.58 −3.15 −1.26%
2011 249.73 −9.52 −3.67%
2010 259.25 −1.57 −0.6%
2009 260.82 −11.57 −4.25%
2008 272.39 −3.9 −1.41%
2007 276.28 +6.37 +2.36%
2006 269.91 +16.78 +6.63%
2005 253.13 +20.87 +8.99%
2004 232.26

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.