Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Nigeria

Bank branches in Nigeria in 2024 — 3.28 per 100k. Ranked 140 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 27.5%.

2024 3.28 per 100k −4.32% vs 2023
World rank 140of 153
Period maximum 6.29 per 100k2010
Period minimum 3.28 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Nigeria, 2004–202434567200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 4.53 per 100k2005: 4.02 per 100k2006: 3.63 per 100k2007: 5 per 100k2008: 6.01 per 100k2009: 6.21 per 100k2010: 6.29 per 100k2011: 6.12 per 100k2012: 5.55 per 100k2013: 5.63 per 100k2014: 5.34 per 100k2015: 4.75 per 100k2016: 4.51 per 100k2017: 4.22 per 100k2018: 4.09 per 100k2019: 4.55 per 100k2020: 4.23 per 100k2021: 4.08 per 100k2022: 3.51 per 100k2023: 3.43 per 100k2024: 3.28 per 100k
Change over the period: −1.25 (−27.52%) Average annual rate: -1.6 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Nigeria

Nigeria 3.28 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Sub-Saharan Africa 4.01 per 100k
Western Africa computed 3.62 per 100k
Lower-middle-income countries computed 11.99 per 100k
Bank branches — Nigeria, by year Nigeria All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 3.28 −0.15 −4.32%
2023 3.43 −0.08 −2.27%
2022 3.51 −0.57 −13.95%
2021 4.08 −0.16 −3.69%
2020 4.23 −0.32 −7%
2019 4.55 +0.46 +11.29%
2018 4.09 −0.13 −3.06%
2017 4.22 −0.3 −6.54%
2016 4.51 −0.23 −4.9%
2015 4.75 −0.59 −11.11%
2014 5.34 −0.28 −5.05%
2013 5.63 +0.08 +1.39%
2012 5.55 −0.58 −9.41%
2011 6.12 −0.16 −2.59%
2010 6.29 +0.07 +1.19%
2009 6.21 +0.2 +3.36%
2008 6.01 +1.01 +20.21%
2007 5 +1.37 +37.61%
2006 3.63 −0.39 −9.65%
2005 4.02 −0.5 −11.14%
2004 4.53

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.