Rural population in American Samoa in 2025 — 8,970 people. Ranked 197 in the world out of 217. Since 1960, the indicator has fallen by 28.6%.
1960–2025 · people
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: American Samoa
| Year | people | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 8,970 | +59 | +0.66% |
| 2024 | 8,911 | +59 | +0.67% |
| 2023 | 8,852 | +51 | +0.58% |
| 2022 | 8,801 | +45 | +0.51% |
| 2021 | 8,756 | +110 | +1.27% |
| 2020 | 8,646 | +138 | +1.62% |
| 2019 | 8,508 | +97 | +1.15% |
| 2018 | 8,411 | +100 | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 8,311 | +101 | +1.23% |
| 2016 | 8,210 | +103 | +1.27% |
| 2015 | 8,107 | +106 | +1.32% |
| 2014 | 8,001 | +108 | +1.37% |
| 2013 | 7,893 | +110 | +1.41% |
| 2012 | 7,783 | +113 | +1.47% |
| 2011 | 7,670 | +114 | +1.51% |
| 2010 | 7,556 | +117 | +1.57% |
| 2009 | 7,439 | +126 | +1.72% |
| 2008 | 7,313 | +132 | +1.84% |
| 2007 | 7,181 | +133 | +1.89% |
| 2006 | 7,048 | +129 | +1.86% |
| 2005 | 6,919 | +121 | +1.78% |
| 2004 | 6,798 | +108 | +1.61% |
| 2003 | 6,690 | +90 | +1.36% |
| 2002 | 6,600 | +69 | +1.06% |
| 2001 | 6,531 | +54 | +0.83% |
| 2000 | 6,477 | −12 | −0.18% |
| 1999 | 6,489 | −231 | −3.44% |
| 1998 | 6,720 | −427 | −5.97% |
| 1997 | 7,147 | −568 | −7.36% |
| 1996 | 7,715 | −658 | −7.86% |
| 1995 | 8,373 | −695 | −7.66% |
| 1994 | 9,068 | −686 | −7.03% |
| 1993 | 9,754 | −632 | −6.09% |
| 1992 | 10,386 | −537 | −4.92% |
| 1991 | 10,923 | −385 | −3.4% |
| 1990 | 11,308 | −227 | −1.97% |
| 1989 | 11,535 | −149 | −1.28% |
| 1988 | 11,684 | −118 | −1% |
| 1987 | 11,802 | −88 | −0.74% |
| 1986 | 11,890 | −54 | −0.45% |
| 1985 | 11,944 | −21 | −0.18% |
| 1984 | 11,965 | +10 | +0.08% |
| 1983 | 11,955 | +44 | +0.37% |
| 1982 | 11,911 | +76 | +0.64% |
| 1981 | 11,835 | +67 | +0.57% |
| 1980 | 11,768 | −31 | −0.26% |
| 1979 | 11,799 | −88 | −0.74% |
| 1978 | 11,887 | −52 | −0.44% |
| 1977 | 11,939 | −28 | −0.23% |
| 1976 | 11,967 | −11 | −0.09% |
| 1975 | 11,978 | −27 | −0.22% |
| 1974 | 12,005 | −60 | −0.5% |
| 1973 | 12,065 | −67 | −0.55% |
| 1972 | 12,132 | −71 | −0.58% |
| 1971 | 12,203 | −68 | −0.55% |
| 1970 | 12,271 | −54 | −0.44% |
| 1969 | 12,325 | −89 | −0.72% |
| 1968 | 12,414 | −143 | −1.14% |
| 1967 | 12,557 | −167 | −1.31% |
| 1966 | 12,724 | −144 | −1.12% |
| 1965 | 12,868 | −89 | −0.69% |
| 1964 | 12,957 | −26 | −0.2% |
| 1963 | 12,983 | +52 | +0.4% |
| 1962 | 12,931 | +150 | +1.17% |
| 1961 | 12,781 | +224 | +1.78% |
| 1960 | 12,557 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
The population living outside urban settlements. In the catalog this quantity was present only as a share, while the absolute number shows what the share does not: the world's rural population stopped growing only in the 2020s and still exceeds three billion people, even though the share has been falling for half a century. Each country defines a city itself, so cross-country comparisons of this series call for caution.
Important: It is computed as the difference between total and urban population, and the criterion for a city is national: in some places it is a settlement of two thousand residents, in others twenty thousand. Comparing the trend within a country is more reliable than comparing countries with each other.
Source: World Population Prospects (UN), license CC BY 3.0 IGO.