Female life expectancy in Latvia in 2024 — 81.5 years. Ranked 64 in the world out of 217. Since 1960, the indicator has risen by 10.9%.
1960–2024 · years
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Latvia
| Year | years | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 81.5 | +0.9 | +1.12% |
| 2023 | 80.6 | +1.2 | +1.51% |
| 2022 | 79.4 | +1.4 | +1.79% |
| 2021 | 78 | −2 | −2.5% |
| 2020 | 80 | −0.1 | −0.12% |
| 2019 | 80.1 | +0.4 | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 79.7 | +0 | +0% |
| 2017 | 79.7 | +0.1 | +0.13% |
| 2016 | 79.6 | +0.1 | +0.13% |
| 2015 | 79.5 | +0.1 | +0.13% |
| 2014 | 79.4 | +0.5 | +0.63% |
| 2013 | 78.9 | +0 | +0% |
| 2012 | 78.9 | +0.1 | +0.13% |
| 2011 | 78.8 | +0.4 | +0.51% |
| 2010 | 78.4 | +0.3 | +0.38% |
| 2009 | 78.1 | +0.2 | +0.26% |
| 2008 | 77.9 | +1.4 | +1.83% |
| 2007 | 76.5 | +0 | +0% |
| 2006 | 76.5 | −0.9 | −1.16% |
| 2005 | 77.4 | +0.2 | +0.26% |
| 2004 | 77.2 | +0.3 | +0.39% |
| 2003 | 76.9 | +0.1 | +0.13% |
| 2002 | 76.8 | +0.2 | +0.26% |
| 2001 | 76.6 | +0.6 | +0.79% |
| 2000 | 76 | +0.71 | +0.94% |
| 1999 | 75.29 | +0.49 | +0.66% |
| 1998 | 74.8 | −0.25 | −0.33% |
| 1997 | 75.05 | +0.25 | +0.33% |
| 1996 | 74.8 | +1.74 | +2.38% |
| 1995 | 73.06 | +0.44 | +0.61% |
| 1994 | 72.62 | −0.71 | −0.97% |
| 1993 | 73.33 | −1.11 | −1.49% |
| 1992 | 74.44 | −0.16 | −0.21% |
| 1991 | 74.6 | +0 | +0% |
| 1990 | 74.6 | −0.58 | −0.77% |
| 1989 | 75.18 | −0.04 | −0.05% |
| 1988 | 75.22 | +0.03 | +0.04% |
| 1987 | 75.19 | +0.05 | +0.07% |
| 1986 | 75.14 | +1.08 | +1.46% |
| 1985 | 74.06 | −0.44 | −0.59% |
| 1984 | 74.5 | −0.12 | −0.16% |
| 1983 | 74.62 | −0.03 | −0.04% |
| 1982 | 74.65 | +0.25 | +0.34% |
| 1981 | 74.4 | +0.28 | +0.38% |
| 1980 | 74.12 | +0.4 | +0.54% |
| 1979 | 73.72 | −0.4 | −0.54% |
| 1978 | 74.12 | −0.04 | −0.05% |
| 1977 | 74.16 | −0.23 | −0.31% |
| 1976 | 74.39 | +0.23 | +0.31% |
| 1975 | 74.16 | −0.58 | −0.78% |
| 1974 | 74.74 | +0.24 | +0.32% |
| 1973 | 74.5 | −0.26 | −0.35% |
| 1972 | 74.76 | −0.04 | −0.05% |
| 1971 | 74.8 | +0.57 | +0.77% |
| 1970 | 74.23 | −0.32 | −0.43% |
| 1969 | 74.55 | +0.01 | +0.01% |
| 1968 | 74.54 | +0.32 | +0.43% |
| 1967 | 74.22 | −0.38 | −0.51% |
| 1966 | 74.6 | −0.26 | −0.35% |
| 1965 | 74.86 | −0.03 | −0.04% |
| 1964 | 74.89 | +1.24 | +1.68% |
| 1963 | 73.65 | +0.46 | +0.63% |
| 1962 | 73.19 | −0.73 | −0.99% |
| 1961 | 73.92 | +0.43 | +0.59% |
| 1960 | 73.49 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Life expectancy at birth for women. The female advantage holds almost everywhere and is explained by both biology and behavior: men die more often from external causes, smoke and drink more, and turn to doctors less. Where maternal mortality is high the advantage narrows — the only factor that works in the opposite direction.
Important: The aggregate is weighted by the female population rather than by the whole population. The difference from male life expectancy is the gap that is usually asked about.
Source: World Population Prospects (UN), license CC BY 3.0 IGO.
How many years men live on average. Almost everywhere less than women.
Demography Life expectancy at birthLife expectancy at birth — how many years a newborn will live on average.
Mortality Adult mortality rate, femaleHow many women out of a thousand fifteen-year-olds will not live to sixty.
Mortality Maternal mortality ratioThe number of deaths of women from causes related to pregnancy per 100,000 live births.
