Female life expectancy in Finland in 2024 — 85 years. Ranked 24 in the world out of 217. Since 1960, the indicator has risen by 17.4%.
1960–2024 · years
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Finland
| Year | years | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 85 | +0.7 | +0.83% |
| 2023 | 84.3 | +0.5 | +0.6% |
| 2022 | 83.8 | −0.8 | −0.95% |
| 2021 | 84.6 | −0.2 | −0.24% |
| 2020 | 84.8 | +0 | +0% |
| 2019 | 84.8 | +0.3 | +0.36% |
| 2018 | 84.5 | +0 | +0% |
| 2017 | 84.5 | +0.1 | +0.12% |
| 2016 | 84.4 | +0 | +0% |
| 2015 | 84.4 | +0.3 | +0.36% |
| 2014 | 84.1 | +0 | +0% |
| 2013 | 84.1 | +0.4 | +0.48% |
| 2012 | 83.7 | −0.1 | −0.12% |
| 2011 | 83.8 | +0.6 | +0.72% |
| 2010 | 83.2 | +0.1 | +0.12% |
| 2009 | 83.1 | +0.1 | +0.12% |
| 2008 | 83 | +0.1 | +0.12% |
| 2007 | 82.9 | +0.1 | +0.12% |
| 2006 | 82.8 | +0.5 | +0.61% |
| 2005 | 82.3 | +0 | +0% |
| 2004 | 82.3 | +0.5 | +0.61% |
| 2003 | 81.8 | +0.3 | +0.37% |
| 2002 | 81.5 | +0 | +0% |
| 2001 | 81.5 | +0.5 | +0.62% |
| 2000 | 81 | −0.02 | −0.02% |
| 1999 | 81.02 | +0.18 | +0.22% |
| 1998 | 80.84 | +0.33 | +0.41% |
| 1997 | 80.51 | −0.03 | −0.04% |
| 1996 | 80.54 | +0.33 | +0.41% |
| 1995 | 80.21 | +0.06 | +0.07% |
| 1994 | 80.15 | +0.67 | +0.84% |
| 1993 | 79.48 | +0.05 | +0.06% |
| 1992 | 79.43 | +0.11 | +0.14% |
| 1991 | 79.32 | +0.44 | +0.56% |
| 1990 | 78.88 | −0.02 | −0.03% |
| 1989 | 78.9 | +0.21 | +0.27% |
| 1988 | 78.69 | −0.02 | −0.03% |
| 1987 | 78.71 | −0.05 | −0.06% |
| 1986 | 78.76 | +0.25 | +0.32% |
| 1985 | 78.51 | −0.25 | −0.32% |
| 1984 | 78.76 | +0.4 | +0.51% |
| 1983 | 78.36 | −0.22 | −0.28% |
| 1982 | 78.58 | +0.49 | +0.63% |
| 1981 | 78.09 | +0.24 | +0.31% |
| 1980 | 77.85 | +0.3 | +0.39% |
| 1979 | 77.55 | +0.12 | +0.15% |
| 1978 | 77.43 | +0.47 | +0.61% |
| 1977 | 76.96 | +0.65 | +0.85% |
| 1976 | 76.31 | +0.17 | +0.22% |
| 1975 | 76.14 | +0.59 | +0.78% |
| 1974 | 75.55 | −0.14 | −0.18% |
| 1973 | 75.69 | +0.67 | +0.89% |
| 1972 | 75.02 | +0.7 | +0.94% |
| 1971 | 74.32 | −0.08 | −0.11% |
| 1970 | 74.4 | +0.84 | +1.14% |
| 1969 | 73.56 | +0.01 | +0.01% |
| 1968 | 73.55 | −0.04 | −0.05% |
| 1967 | 73.59 | +0.42 | +0.57% |
| 1966 | 73.17 | +0.32 | +0.44% |
| 1965 | 72.85 | −0.11 | −0.15% |
| 1964 | 72.96 | +0.28 | +0.39% |
| 1963 | 72.68 | +0.44 | +0.61% |
| 1962 | 72.24 | +0 | +0% |
| 1961 | 72.24 | −0.16 | −0.22% |
| 1960 | 72.4 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Life expectancy at birth for women. The female advantage holds almost everywhere and is explained by both biology and behavior: men die more often from external causes, smoke and drink more, and turn to doctors less. Where maternal mortality is high the advantage narrows — the only factor that works in the opposite direction.
Important: The aggregate is weighted by the female population rather than by the whole population. The difference from male life expectancy is the gap that is usually asked about.
Source: World Population Prospects (UN), license CC BY 3.0 IGO.
How many years men live on average. Almost everywhere less than women.
Demography Life expectancy at birthLife expectancy at birth — how many years a newborn will live on average.
Mortality Adult mortality rate, femaleHow many women out of a thousand fifteen-year-olds will not live to sixty.
Mortality Maternal mortality ratioThe number of deaths of women from causes related to pregnancy per 100,000 live births.
