Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — OECD

Youth unemployment in the OECD in 2025 — 11.61%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 1.72 pp.

2025 11.61% +0.04 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 17.74%2010
Period minimum 11.23%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — OECD, 1991–2025101214161819911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.33%1992: 13.95%1993: 15.16%1994: 15.45%1995: 15.57%1996: 15.59%1997: 15.05%1998: 14.85%1999: 15%2000: 14.09%2001: 13.94%2002: 14.81%2003: 15.25%2004: 15.28%2005: 14.8%2006: 13.9%2007: 13.11%2008: 13.85%2009: 17.62%2010: 17.74%2011: 17.26%2012: 17.41%2013: 17.33%2014: 16.26%2015: 15.08%2016: 14.22%2017: 13.22%2018: 12.45%2019: 12.59%2020: 15.82%2021: 13.62%2022: 11.57%2023: 11.23%2024: 11.57%2025: 11.61%
Change over the period: −1.72 pp Annual average: -0.05 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: OECD

OECD 11.61%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — OECD, by year OECD All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 11.61 +0.04 pp
2024 11.57 +0.34 pp
2023 11.23 −0.34 pp
2022 11.57 −2.05 pp
2021 13.62 −2.2 pp
2020 15.82 +3.23 pp
2019 12.59 +0.13 pp
2018 12.45 −0.76 pp
2017 13.22 −1.01 pp
2016 14.22 −0.86 pp
2015 15.08 −1.17 pp
2014 16.26 −1.07 pp
2013 17.33 −0.09 pp
2012 17.41 +0.16 pp
2011 17.26 −0.48 pp
2010 17.74 +0.12 pp
2009 17.62 +3.77 pp
2008 13.85 +0.74 pp
2007 13.11 −0.79 pp
2006 13.9 −0.9 pp
2005 14.8 −0.48 pp
2004 15.28 +0.03 pp
2003 15.25 +0.43 pp
2002 14.81 +0.88 pp
2001 13.94 −0.16 pp
2000 14.09 −0.9 pp
1999 15 +0.15 pp
1998 14.85 −0.2 pp
1997 15.05 −0.54 pp
1996 15.59 +0.02 pp
1995 15.57 +0.12 pp
1994 15.45 +0.28 pp
1993 15.16 +1.21 pp
1992 13.95 +0.62 pp
1991 13.33

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.