Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — North America

Youth unemployment in North America in 2025 — 9.77%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 3.97 pp.

2025 9.77% +0.43 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 18%2010
Period minimum 8.23%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — North America, 1991–20257.51012.51517.52019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.74%1992: 14.6%1993: 13.8%1994: 12.88%1995: 12.45%1996: 12.42%1997: 11.9%1998: 10.88%1999: 10.29%2000: 9.6%2001: 10.72%2002: 12.09%2003: 12.48%2004: 11.95%2005: 11.35%2006: 10.54%2007: 10.52%2008: 12.63%2009: 17.29%2010: 18%2011: 16.95%2012: 16.01%2013: 15.34%2014: 13.39%2015: 11.74%2016: 10.63%2017: 9.43%2018: 8.81%2019: 8.6%2020: 15.39%2021: 10.07%2022: 8.29%2023: 8.23%2024: 9.34%2025: 9.77%
Change over the period: −3.97 pp Annual average: -0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: North America

North America 9.77%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — North America, by year North America All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 9.77 +0.43 pp
2024 9.34 +1.12 pp
2023 8.23 −0.07 pp
2022 8.29 −1.78 pp
2021 10.07 −5.32 pp
2020 15.39 +6.79 pp
2019 8.6 −0.21 pp
2018 8.81 −0.62 pp
2017 9.43 −1.21 pp
2016 10.63 −1.1 pp
2015 11.74 −1.65 pp
2014 13.39 −1.95 pp
2013 15.34 −0.67 pp
2012 16.01 −0.95 pp
2011 16.95 −1.05 pp
2010 18 +0.72 pp
2009 17.29 +4.66 pp
2008 12.63 +2.11 pp
2007 10.52 −0.02 pp
2006 10.54 −0.81 pp
2005 11.35 −0.6 pp
2004 11.95 −0.53 pp
2003 12.48 +0.39 pp
2002 12.09 +1.38 pp
2001 10.72 +1.12 pp
2000 9.6 −0.69 pp
1999 10.29 −0.59 pp
1998 10.88 −1.02 pp
1997 11.9 −0.52 pp
1996 12.42 −0.03 pp
1995 12.45 −0.44 pp
1994 12.88 −0.92 pp
1993 13.8 −0.8 pp
1992 14.6 +0.86 pp
1991 13.74

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.