Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — NATO

Youth unemployment in NATO in 2025 — 13.39%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 2.65 pp.

2025 13.39% +0.14 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 21.47%2013
Period minimum 12.7%2023

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — NATO, 1991–202512.51517.52022.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 16.03%1992: 17.16%1993: 18.66%1994: 18.66%1995: 18.11%1996: 18.03%1997: 17.34%1998: 16.19%1999: 16.03%2000: 14.93%2001: 15.13%2002: 16.24%2003: 16.61%2004: 16.58%2005: 16.6%2006: 15.46%2007: 14.4%2008: 15.37%2009: 19.94%2010: 20.78%2011: 20.63%2012: 21.32%2013: 21.47%2014: 19.95%2015: 18.33%2016: 16.95%2017: 15.38%2018: 14.07%2019: 13.7%2020: 17.52%2021: 15.04%2022: 12.85%2023: 12.7%2024: 13.25%2025: 13.39%
Change over the period: −2.65 pp Annual average: -0.08 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: NATO

NATO 13.39%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — NATO, by year NATO All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 13.39 +0.14 pp
2024 13.25 +0.55 pp
2023 12.7 −0.15 pp
2022 12.85 −2.19 pp
2021 15.04 −2.49 pp
2020 17.52 +3.82 pp
2019 13.7 −0.36 pp
2018 14.07 −1.31 pp
2017 15.38 −1.58 pp
2016 16.95 −1.38 pp
2015 18.33 −1.62 pp
2014 19.95 −1.51 pp
2013 21.47 +0.14 pp
2012 21.32 +0.69 pp
2011 20.63 −0.16 pp
2010 20.78 +0.84 pp
2009 19.94 +4.56 pp
2008 15.37 +0.97 pp
2007 14.4 −1.06 pp
2006 15.46 −1.14 pp
2005 16.6 +0.02 pp
2004 16.58 −0.03 pp
2003 16.61 +0.37 pp
2002 16.24 +1.11 pp
2001 15.13 +0.2 pp
2000 14.93 −1.1 pp
1999 16.03 −0.17 pp
1998 16.19 −1.15 pp
1997 17.34 −0.69 pp
1996 18.03 −0.08 pp
1995 18.11 −0.55 pp
1994 18.66 +0 pp
1993 18.66 +1.5 pp
1992 17.16 +1.12 pp
1991 16.03

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.