Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Mercosur

Youth unemployment in Mercosur in 2025 — 14.44%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 2 pp.

2025 14.44% −1.36 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 29.33%2020
Period minimum 12.44%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Mercosur, 1991–2025101520253019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 12.44%1992: 13.07%1993: 13.15%1994: 14.42%1995: 17.48%1996: 18.25%1997: 18.8%1998: 19.94%1999: 21.47%2000: 21.67%2001: 22.16%2002: 23.33%2003: 22.62%2004: 20.96%2005: 21.42%2006: 19.89%2007: 18.44%2008: 17.23%2009: 19.3%2010: 17.8%2011: 16.66%2012: 15.66%2013: 15.8%2014: 15.58%2015: 18.97%2016: 24.73%2017: 26.49%2018: 26.12%2019: 25.77%2020: 29.33%2021: 26.35%2022: 19.68%2023: 17.31%2024: 15.81%2025: 14.44%
Change over the period: +2 pp Annual average: 0.06 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Mercosur

Mercosur 14.44%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — Mercosur, by year Mercosur All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 14.44 −1.36 pp
2024 15.81 −1.5 pp
2023 17.31 −2.38 pp
2022 19.68 −6.66 pp
2021 26.35 −2.98 pp
2020 29.33 +3.56 pp
2019 25.77 −0.35 pp
2018 26.12 −0.37 pp
2017 26.49 +1.76 pp
2016 24.73 +5.76 pp
2015 18.97 +3.39 pp
2014 15.58 −0.21 pp
2013 15.8 +0.13 pp
2012 15.66 −1 pp
2011 16.66 −1.14 pp
2010 17.8 −1.5 pp
2009 19.3 +2.08 pp
2008 17.23 −1.22 pp
2007 18.44 −1.44 pp
2006 19.89 −1.53 pp
2005 21.42 +0.46 pp
2004 20.96 −1.66 pp
2003 22.62 −0.71 pp
2002 23.33 +1.17 pp
2001 22.16 +0.49 pp
2000 21.67 +0.19 pp
1999 21.47 +1.53 pp
1998 19.94 +1.14 pp
1997 18.8 +0.55 pp
1996 18.25 +0.77 pp
1995 17.48 +3.05 pp
1994 14.42 +1.27 pp
1993 13.15 +0.08 pp
1992 13.07 +0.63 pp
1991 12.44

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.