Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Kenya

Youth unemployment in Kenya in 2025 — 15.25%. Ranked 110 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 9.04 pp.

2025 15.25% −0.23 pp vs 2024
World rank 110of 182
Period maximum 15.49%2022
Period minimum 6.21%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Kenya, 1991–202557.51012.51517.519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 6.21%1992: 6.47%1993: 6.67%1994: 6.67%1995: 6.51%1996: 6.41%1997: 6.54%1998: 6.62%1999: 6.74%2000: 6.76%2001: 6.78%2002: 6.89%2003: 6.83%2004: 6.82%2005: 6.65%2006: 6.57%2007: 6.56%2008: 6.84%2009: 7.03%2010: 7.05%2011: 6.92%2012: 6.95%2013: 7.18%2014: 7.25%2015: 7.3%2016: 7.33%2017: 9.1%2018: 10.82%2019: 12.55%2020: 13.62%2021: 12.23%2022: 15.49%2023: 15.16%2024: 15.48%2025: 15.25%
Change over the period: +9.04 pp Annual average: 0.27 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kenya

Kenya 15.25%
World 13.41%
Eastern Africa computed 7.77%
Youth unemployment — Kenya, by year Kenya All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.25 −0.23 pp
2024 15.48 +0.31 pp
2023 15.16 −0.32 pp
2022 15.49 +3.26 pp
2021 12.23 −1.39 pp
2020 13.62 +1.07 pp
2019 12.55 +1.73 pp
2018 10.82 +1.72 pp
2017 9.1 +1.76 pp
2016 7.33 +0.03 pp
2015 7.3 +0.05 pp
2014 7.25 +0.07 pp
2013 7.18 +0.24 pp
2012 6.95 +0.02 pp
2011 6.92 −0.13 pp
2010 7.05 +0.02 pp
2009 7.03 +0.19 pp
2008 6.84 +0.28 pp
2007 6.56 −0.01 pp
2006 6.57 −0.08 pp
2005 6.65 −0.16 pp
2004 6.82 −0.01 pp
2003 6.83 −0.06 pp
2002 6.89 +0.11 pp
2001 6.78 +0.01 pp
2000 6.76 +0.03 pp
1999 6.74 +0.12 pp
1998 6.62 +0.08 pp
1997 6.54 +0.13 pp
1996 6.41 −0.1 pp
1995 6.51 −0.16 pp
1994 6.67 +0 pp
1993 6.67 +0.2 pp
1992 6.47 +0.26 pp
1991 6.21

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.