Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — European Union

Youth unemployment in the European Union in 2025 — 16.2%. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 2.91 pp.

2025 16.2% −0.04 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 26.94%2013
Period minimum 16.2%2025

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — European Union, 1991–20251520253019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 19.11%1992: 20.21%1993: 23.65%1994: 24.91%1995: 24.26%1996: 24.42%1997: 23.29%1998: 21.81%1999: 21.96%2000: 20.67%2001: 20.18%2002: 20.99%2003: 20.95%2004: 21.35%2005: 21.4%2006: 19.55%2007: 16.99%2008: 16.92%2009: 21.5%2010: 22.94%2011: 23.73%2012: 25.95%2013: 26.94%2014: 25.96%2015: 24.22%2016: 22.41%2017: 20.09%2018: 18.11%2019: 16.98%2020: 19.01%2021: 18.74%2022: 16.36%2023: 16.23%2024: 16.24%2025: 16.2%
Change over the period: −2.91 pp Annual average: -0.09 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: European Union

European Union 16.2%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — European Union, by year European Union All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 16.2 −0.04 pp
2024 16.24 +0.01 pp
2023 16.23 −0.13 pp
2022 16.36 −2.37 pp
2021 18.74 −0.28 pp
2020 19.01 +2.04 pp
2019 16.98 −1.14 pp
2018 18.11 −1.98 pp
2017 20.09 −2.32 pp
2016 22.41 −1.81 pp
2015 24.22 −1.74 pp
2014 25.96 −0.98 pp
2013 26.94 +0.99 pp
2012 25.95 +2.22 pp
2011 23.73 +0.8 pp
2010 22.94 +1.44 pp
2009 21.5 +4.57 pp
2008 16.92 −0.07 pp
2007 16.99 −2.55 pp
2006 19.55 −1.86 pp
2005 21.4 +0.06 pp
2004 21.35 +0.39 pp
2003 20.95 −0.03 pp
2002 20.99 +0.81 pp
2001 20.18 −0.49 pp
2000 20.67 −1.29 pp
1999 21.96 +0.15 pp
1998 21.81 −1.49 pp
1997 23.29 −1.13 pp
1996 24.42 +0.16 pp
1995 24.26 −0.64 pp
1994 24.91 +1.26 pp
1993 23.65 +3.43 pp
1992 20.21 +1.1 pp
1991 19.11

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.