Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Cameroon

Youth unemployment in Cameroon in 2025 — 6.55%. Ranked 38 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 6.65 pp.

2025 6.55% −0.07 pp vs 2024
World rank 38of 182
Period maximum 13.33%1993
Period minimum 4.58%2007

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Cameroon, 1991–202505101519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 13.2%1992: 13.25%1993: 13.33%1994: 13.03%1995: 12.73%1996: 12.14%1997: 11.87%1998: 11.65%1999: 11.49%2000: 11.38%2001: 11.26%2002: 10.12%2003: 8.92%2004: 7.7%2005: 6.63%2006: 5.6%2007: 4.58%2008: 5.12%2009: 5.71%2010: 6.32%2011: 6.31%2012: 6.27%2013: 6.24%2014: 6.2%2015: 6.23%2016: 6.3%2017: 6.41%2018: 6.5%2019: 6.59%2020: 7.37%2021: 7.23%2022: 6.67%2023: 6.62%2024: 6.62%2025: 6.55%
Change over the period: −6.65 pp Annual average: -0.2 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Cameroon

Cameroon 6.55%
World 13.41%
Middle Africa computed 12.58%
Youth unemployment — Cameroon, by year Cameroon All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 6.55 −0.07 pp
2024 6.62 −0 pp
2023 6.62 −0.05 pp
2022 6.67 −0.56 pp
2021 7.23 −0.15 pp
2020 7.37 +0.79 pp
2019 6.59 +0.08 pp
2018 6.5 +0.1 pp
2017 6.41 +0.11 pp
2016 6.3 +0.07 pp
2015 6.23 +0.03 pp
2014 6.2 −0.04 pp
2013 6.24 −0.04 pp
2012 6.27 −0.04 pp
2011 6.31 −0.01 pp
2010 6.32 +0.61 pp
2009 5.71 +0.59 pp
2008 5.12 +0.54 pp
2007 4.58 −1.02 pp
2006 5.6 −1.03 pp
2005 6.63 −1.07 pp
2004 7.7 −1.22 pp
2003 8.92 −1.2 pp
2002 10.12 −1.14 pp
2001 11.26 −0.12 pp
2000 11.38 −0.11 pp
1999 11.49 −0.16 pp
1998 11.65 −0.23 pp
1997 11.87 −0.27 pp
1996 12.14 −0.59 pp
1995 12.73 −0.3 pp
1994 13.03 −0.3 pp
1993 13.33 +0.08 pp
1992 13.25 +0.05 pp
1991 13.2

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.