Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — BRICS

Youth unemployment in BRICS in 2025 — 15.92%. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 5.5 pp.

2025 15.92% +0.3 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 18.75%2020
Period minimum 10.42%1991

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — BRICS, 1991–20251012.51517.52019911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 10.42%1992: 10.55%1993: 10.95%1994: 11.73%1995: 12.13%1996: 12.47%1997: 13.03%1998: 13.61%1999: 13.86%2000: 13.77%2001: 14.28%2002: 14.96%2003: 15.47%2004: 15.46%2005: 15.78%2006: 15.63%2007: 15.42%2008: 15.57%2009: 16.25%2010: 16.05%2011: 16.09%2012: 16.08%2013: 16.24%2014: 16.45%2015: 17.12%2016: 17.65%2017: 17.75%2018: 17.71%2019: 16.94%2020: 18.75%2021: 17.28%2022: 16.78%2023: 16.04%2024: 15.62%2025: 15.92%
Change over the period: +5.5 pp Annual average: 0.16 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: BRICS

BRICS 15.92%
World 13.41%
Youth unemployment — BRICS, by year BRICS All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 15.92 +0.3 pp
2024 15.62 −0.41 pp
2023 16.04 −0.75 pp
2022 16.78 −0.49 pp
2021 17.28 −1.47 pp
2020 18.75 +1.82 pp
2019 16.94 −0.77 pp
2018 17.71 −0.04 pp
2017 17.75 +0.1 pp
2016 17.65 +0.54 pp
2015 17.12 +0.67 pp
2014 16.45 +0.21 pp
2013 16.24 +0.16 pp
2012 16.08 −0.01 pp
2011 16.09 +0.03 pp
2010 16.05 −0.19 pp
2009 16.25 +0.68 pp
2008 15.57 +0.15 pp
2007 15.42 −0.21 pp
2006 15.63 −0.14 pp
2005 15.78 +0.31 pp
2004 15.46 −0.01 pp
2003 15.47 +0.51 pp
2002 14.96 +0.68 pp
2001 14.28 +0.51 pp
2000 13.77 −0.09 pp
1999 13.86 +0.25 pp
1998 13.61 +0.58 pp
1997 13.03 +0.56 pp
1996 12.47 +0.33 pp
1995 12.13 +0.41 pp
1994 11.73 +0.77 pp
1993 10.95 +0.4 pp
1992 10.55 +0.13 pp
1991 10.42

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.