Youth unemployment — all countries

Youth unemployment — Bahamas

Youth unemployment in the Bahamas in 2025 — 19.25%. Ranked 131 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 3.8 pp.

2025 19.25% +0.96 pp vs 2024
World rank 131of 182
Period maximum 34.47%2013
Period minimum 15.2%2001

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of labor force aged 15–24

Youth unemployment — Bahamas, 1991–2025152025303519911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 23.04%1992: 27.43%1993: 23.45%1994: 25.6%1995: 21.3%1996: 24.55%1997: 23%1998: 16.1%1999: 15.85%2000: 15.46%2001: 15.2%2002: 20.38%2003: 24.65%2004: 21.75%2005: 20.26%2006: 16.4%2007: 18.92%2008: 17.02%2009: 26%2010: 26.55%2011: 27%2012: 30.36%2013: 34.47%2014: 28.99%2015: 24.78%2016: 25.84%2017: 21.55%2018: 24.16%2019: 19.24%2020: 23.94%2021: 21.77%2022: 18.69%2023: 17.7%2024: 18.29%2025: 19.25%
Change over the period: −3.8 pp Annual average: -0.11 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Bahamas

Bahamas 19.25%
World 13.41%
High-income countries computed 11.17%
Youth unemployment — Bahamas, by year Bahamas All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 19.25 +0.96 pp
2024 18.29 +0.59 pp
2023 17.7 −1 pp
2022 18.69 −3.07 pp
2021 21.77 −2.18 pp
2020 23.94 +4.71 pp
2019 19.24 −4.93 pp
2018 24.16 +2.61 pp
2017 21.55 −4.3 pp
2016 25.84 +1.06 pp
2015 24.78 −4.21 pp
2014 28.99 −5.47 pp
2013 34.47 +4.11 pp
2012 30.36 +3.36 pp
2011 27 +0.45 pp
2010 26.55 +0.55 pp
2009 26 +8.99 pp
2008 17.02 −1.9 pp
2007 18.92 +2.52 pp
2006 16.4 −3.86 pp
2005 20.26 −1.49 pp
2004 21.75 −2.9 pp
2003 24.65 +4.28 pp
2002 20.38 +5.17 pp
2001 15.2 −0.25 pp
2000 15.46 −0.4 pp
1999 15.85 −0.25 pp
1998 16.1 −6.9 pp
1997 23 −1.55 pp
1996 24.55 +3.25 pp
1995 21.3 −4.29 pp
1994 25.6 +2.15 pp
1993 23.45 −3.98 pp
1992 27.43 +4.39 pp
1991 23.04

About the indicator

The share of the economically active population aged 15–24 that is unemployed. In almost every country youth unemployment runs two to three times above the overall rate: the young have no experience, and their first entry into the labor market puts them up against more qualified workers. A sharp gap with the overall rate points to structural problems in the transition from school to work.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.