Labor productivity in Guatemala in 2025 — 32,425 $/person. Ranked 102 in the world out of 168. Since 1991, the indicator has risen by 50.1%.
1991–2025 · PPP $ per person employed
How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Guatemala
| Year | $/person | Change | Change, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32,425 | +644 | +2.03% |
| 2024 | 31,782 | +430 | +1.37% |
| 2023 | 31,352 | +448 | +1.45% |
| 2022 | 30,904 | +2,124 | +7.38% |
| 2021 | 28,781 | −621 | −2.11% |
| 2020 | 29,402 | −779 | −2.58% |
| 2019 | 30,181 | +1,117 | +3.84% |
| 2018 | 29,064 | +418 | +1.46% |
| 2017 | 28,646 | −38 | −0.13% |
| 2016 | 28,684 | −28 | −0.1% |
| 2015 | 28,712 | +384 | +1.36% |
| 2014 | 28,328 | +114 | +0.4% |
| 2013 | 28,214 | +2,382 | +9.22% |
| 2012 | 25,832 | −1,684 | −6.12% |
| 2011 | 27,515 | −218 | −0.79% |
| 2010 | 27,733 | +246 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 27,487 | −397 | −1.42% |
| 2008 | 27,884 | +280 | +1.01% |
| 2007 | 27,604 | +1,010 | +3.8% |
| 2006 | 26,595 | +743 | +2.87% |
| 2005 | 25,852 | +265 | +1.04% |
| 2004 | 25,587 | +1,829 | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 23,757 | −244 | −1.02% |
| 2002 | 24,001 | +210 | +0.88% |
| 2001 | 23,792 | −66 | −0.28% |
| 2000 | 23,857 | +177 | +0.75% |
| 1999 | 23,680 | +168 | +0.71% |
| 1998 | 23,512 | +413 | +1.79% |
| 1997 | 23,099 | +295 | +1.29% |
| 1996 | 22,804 | +22 | +0.1% |
| 1995 | 22,781 | +422 | +1.89% |
| 1994 | 22,360 | +220 | +0.99% |
| 1993 | 22,140 | +180 | +0.82% |
| 1992 | 21,960 | +365 | +1.69% |
| 1991 | 21,596 | — | — |
The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages
Gross domestic product per person employed in constant dollars at purchasing power parity. It differs from GDP per capita in the denominator: there the whole population, here only those who work — and the difference between the two indicators speaks of demography and employment. A country can have a low GDP per capita alongside decent productivity simply because only a small part of the population works: many children, many women out of employment, early retirement.
Important: There are no aggregates for country groups: the correct denominator is the number of people employed, and we have no separate series for the employed. The labor force will not do — it includes the unemployed, and the discrepancy is largest precisely in countries with high unemployment.
Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.
The soundest measure of living standards: income per person adjusted for prices.
Labor Employment-to-population ratioThe share of the population aged 15 and over that actually works.
Labor Labor forceThe number of people employed or actively looking for work — the economically active population.
Labor Vulnerable employmentThe share of own-account and contributing family workers — with no contract, insurance or guarantees.
