Income share of the richest 20% — all countries

Income share of the richest 20% — Sweden

Income share of the richest 20% in Sweden in 2023 — 37.2%. Ranked 11 in the world out of 57. Since 1975, the indicator has risen by 3 pp.

2023 37.2% −1.9 pp vs 2022
World rank 11of 57
Period maximum 39.1%2022
Period minimum 32.8%1981

Trend over time

1975–2023 · % of income

Income share of the richest 20% — Sweden, 1975–20233234363840197519801985199019952000200520102015202020231975: 34.2%1981: 32.8%1987: 33.2%1992: 34.5%1995: 34.4%2000: 36.5%2001: 36.3%2002: 35.8%2003: 34.7%2004: 35.5%2005: 35.6%2006: 35.6%2007: 36.2%2008: 36.9%2009: 36.2%2010: 36.6%2011: 36.3%2012: 36.4%2013: 37%2014: 37%2015: 37.6%2016: 37.8%2017: 37.1%2018: 37.8%2019: 37.5%2020: 37.2%2021: 37.7%2022: 39.1%2023: 37.2%
Change over the period: +3 pp Annual average: 0.06 pp
Income share of the richest 20% — Sweden, by year Sweden All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2023 37.2 −1.9 pp
2022 39.1 +1.4 pp
2021 37.7 +0.5 pp
2020 37.2 −0.3 pp
2019 37.5 −0.3 pp
2018 37.8 +0.7 pp
2017 37.1 −0.7 pp
2016 37.8 +0.2 pp
2015 37.6 +0.6 pp
2014 37 +0 pp
2013 37 +0.6 pp
2012 36.4 +0.1 pp
2011 36.3 −0.3 pp
2010 36.6 +0.4 pp
2009 36.2 −0.7 pp
2008 36.9 +0.7 pp
2007 36.2 +0.6 pp
2006 35.6 +0 pp
2005 35.6 +0.1 pp
2004 35.5 +0.8 pp
2003 34.7 −1.1 pp
2002 35.8 −0.5 pp
2001 36.3 −0.2 pp
2000 36.5
1995 34.4
1992 34.5
1987 33.2
1981 32.8
1975 34.2

Northern Europe, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of total income or consumption that goes to the richest twenty percent of the population. Under complete equality it would be twenty percent; in the most unequal countries of Latin America and Southern Africa it comes to more than sixty. The ratio of this share to the share of the poorest quintile — the quintile ratio, S80/S20 — was historically the first measure of inequality, and it speaks more clearly than the Gini index about the gap between the poles.

Important: There are no aggregates for country groups for the same reason as with the Gini index: the quintile of a group is not a union of national quintiles. Household surveys systematically understate the incomes of the richest, so real inequality is higher than measured.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.