Income share of the richest 20% — all countries

Income share of the richest 20% — Luxembourg

Income share of the richest 20% in Luxembourg in 2023 — 40.7%. Ranked 25 in the world out of 57. Since 1985, the indicator has risen by 4.7 pp.

2023 40.7% −0.4 pp vs 2022
World rank 25of 57
Period maximum 42.2%2018
Period minimum 36%1985

Trend over time

1985–2023 · % of income

Income share of the richest 20% — Luxembourg, 1985–20233638404244198519891993199720012005200920132017202120231985: 36%1986: 37.4%1987: 38.4%1988: 38%1989: 40.1%1990: 37.2%1991: 36.6%1992: 36.8%1993: 36.9%1994: 37.2%1995: 37.4%1996: 37.8%1997: 38.3%1998: 39.1%1999: 38.6%2000: 38.8%2001: 39.5%2002: 39.8%2003: 38.6%2004: 38.7%2005: 39.4%2006: 39.4%2007: 39.7%2008: 40.8%2009: 39.2%2010: 38.8%2011: 39.9%2012: 41.7%2013: 39.7%2014: 39.1%2015: 40.3%2016: 39.2%2017: 41.4%2018: 42.2%2019: 41.4%2020: 40.5%2021: 40%2022: 41.1%2023: 40.7%
Change over the period: +4.7 pp Annual average: 0.12 pp
Income share of the richest 20% — Luxembourg, by year Luxembourg All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2023 40.7 −0.4 pp
2022 41.1 +1.1 pp
2021 40 −0.5 pp
2020 40.5 −0.9 pp
2019 41.4 −0.8 pp
2018 42.2 +0.8 pp
2017 41.4 +2.2 pp
2016 39.2 −1.1 pp
2015 40.3 +1.2 pp
2014 39.1 −0.6 pp
2013 39.7 −2 pp
2012 41.7 +1.8 pp
2011 39.9 +1.1 pp
2010 38.8 −0.4 pp
2009 39.2 −1.6 pp
2008 40.8 +1.1 pp
2007 39.7 +0.3 pp
2006 39.4 +0 pp
2005 39.4 +0.7 pp
2004 38.7 +0.1 pp
2003 38.6 −1.2 pp
2002 39.8 +0.3 pp
2001 39.5 +0.7 pp
2000 38.8 +0.2 pp
1999 38.6 −0.5 pp
1998 39.1 +0.8 pp
1997 38.3 +0.5 pp
1996 37.8 +0.4 pp
1995 37.4 +0.2 pp
1994 37.2 +0.3 pp
1993 36.9 +0.1 pp
1992 36.8 +0.2 pp
1991 36.6 −0.6 pp
1990 37.2 −2.9 pp
1989 40.1 +2.1 pp
1988 38 −0.4 pp
1987 38.4 +1 pp
1986 37.4 +1.4 pp
1985 36

Western Europe, 2023

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The share of total income or consumption that goes to the richest twenty percent of the population. Under complete equality it would be twenty percent; in the most unequal countries of Latin America and Southern Africa it comes to more than sixty. The ratio of this share to the share of the poorest quintile — the quintile ratio, S80/S20 — was historically the first measure of inequality, and it speaks more clearly than the Gini index about the gap between the poles.

Important: There are no aggregates for country groups for the same reason as with the Gini index: the quintile of a group is not a union of national quintiles. Household surveys systematically understate the incomes of the richest, so real inequality is higher than measured.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.