Income share of the richest 20% — all countries

Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica

Income share of the richest 20% in Costa Rica in 2025 — 50.9%. Ranked 3 in the world out of 4. Since 1981, the indicator has fallen by 0.5 pp.

2025 50.9% −0.2 pp vs 2024
World rank 3of 4
Period maximum 56.7%2002
Period minimum 39.6%1986

Trend over time

1981–2025 · % of income

Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica, 1981–202535404550556019811986199119962001200620112016202120251981: 51.4%1986: 39.6%1989: 49.9%1990: 49.6%1991: 50.8%1992: 50.3%1993: 50.5%1994: 51.5%1995: 50.3%1996: 51.1%1997: 50.6%1998: 50.8%1999: 52.6%2000: 52.1%2001: 56.2%2002: 56.7%2003: 54%2004: 53.4%2005: 52.8%2006: 54.7%2007: 55%2008: 54.1%2009: 55.9%2010: 53.6%2011: 53.9%2012: 53.6%2013: 54.2%2014: 53.9%2015: 53.9%2016: 54%2017: 54%2018: 53.3%2019: 53.7%2020: 54.4%2021: 54.1%2022: 52.7%2023: 52.1%2024: 51.1%2025: 50.9%
Change over the period: −0.5 pp Annual average: -0.01 pp
Income share of the richest 20% — Costa Rica, by year Costa Rica All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 50.9 −0.2 pp
2024 51.1 −1 pp
2023 52.1 −0.6 pp
2022 52.7 −1.4 pp
2021 54.1 −0.3 pp
2020 54.4 +0.7 pp
2019 53.7 +0.4 pp
2018 53.3 −0.7 pp
2017 54 +0 pp
2016 54 +0.1 pp
2015 53.9 +0 pp
2014 53.9 −0.3 pp
2013 54.2 +0.6 pp
2012 53.6 −0.3 pp
2011 53.9 +0.3 pp
2010 53.6 −2.3 pp
2009 55.9 +1.8 pp
2008 54.1 −0.9 pp
2007 55 +0.3 pp
2006 54.7 +1.9 pp
2005 52.8 −0.6 pp
2004 53.4 −0.6 pp
2003 54 −2.7 pp
2002 56.7 +0.5 pp
2001 56.2 +4.1 pp
2000 52.1 −0.5 pp
1999 52.6 +1.8 pp
1998 50.8 +0.2 pp
1997 50.6 −0.5 pp
1996 51.1 +0.8 pp
1995 50.3 −1.2 pp
1994 51.5 +1 pp
1993 50.5 +0.2 pp
1992 50.3 −0.5 pp
1991 50.8 +1.2 pp
1990 49.6 −0.3 pp
1989 49.9
1986 39.6
1981 51.4

About the indicator

The share of total income or consumption that goes to the richest twenty percent of the population. Under complete equality it would be twenty percent; in the most unequal countries of Latin America and Southern Africa it comes to more than sixty. The ratio of this share to the share of the poorest quintile — the quintile ratio, S80/S20 — was historically the first measure of inequality, and it speaks more clearly than the Gini index about the gap between the poles.

Important: There are no aggregates for country groups for the same reason as with the Gini index: the quintile of a group is not a union of national quintiles. Household surveys systematically understate the incomes of the richest, so real inequality is higher than measured.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.