Female labor force participation rate — all countries

Female labor force participation rate — Melanesia

Female labor force participation rate in Melanesia in 2025 — 52.02%. Since 1990, the indicator has risen by 1.93 pp.

2025 52.02% +0.11 pp vs 2024
World rank
Period maximum 52.02%2025
Period minimum 49.3%1994

Trend over time

1990–2025 · % of women aged 15+

Female labor force participation rate — Melanesia, 1990–2025495051525319901994199820022006201020142018202220251990: 50.09%1991: 49.95%1992: 49.68%1993: 49.36%1994: 49.3%1995: 49.48%1996: 49.4%1997: 49.56%1998: 49.7%1999: 49.72%2000: 49.89%2001: 49.97%2002: 50.06%2003: 50.03%2004: 49.99%2005: 49.75%2006: 49.86%2007: 49.81%2008: 49.99%2009: 49.95%2010: 49.82%2011: 50.32%2012: 50.41%2013: 50.53%2014: 50.41%2015: 50.43%2016: 50.48%2017: 50.71%2018: 51.05%2019: 51.25%2020: 50.91%2021: 51.64%2022: 51.83%2023: 51.86%2024: 51.92%2025: 52.02%
Change over the period: +1.93 pp Annual average: 0.06 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Melanesia

Melanesia 52.02%
World 48.94%
Female labor force participation rate — Melanesia, by year Melanesia All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 52.02 +0.11 pp
2024 51.92 +0.06 pp
2023 51.86 +0.03 pp
2022 51.83 +0.18 pp
2021 51.64 +0.73 pp
2020 50.91 −0.34 pp
2019 51.25 +0.2 pp
2018 51.05 +0.34 pp
2017 50.71 +0.23 pp
2016 50.48 +0.05 pp
2015 50.43 +0.02 pp
2014 50.41 −0.13 pp
2013 50.53 +0.12 pp
2012 50.41 +0.1 pp
2011 50.32 +0.49 pp
2010 49.82 −0.13 pp
2009 49.95 −0.04 pp
2008 49.99 +0.17 pp
2007 49.81 −0.05 pp
2006 49.86 +0.11 pp
2005 49.75 −0.24 pp
2004 49.99 −0.04 pp
2003 50.03 −0.02 pp
2002 50.06 +0.08 pp
2001 49.97 +0.09 pp
2000 49.89 +0.17 pp
1999 49.72 +0.01 pp
1998 49.7 +0.15 pp
1997 49.56 +0.16 pp
1996 49.4 −0.08 pp
1995 49.48 +0.18 pp
1994 49.3 −0.06 pp
1993 49.36 −0.32 pp
1992 49.68 −0.28 pp
1991 49.95 −0.14 pp
1990 50.09

About the indicator

The share of women aged 15 and over who belong to the labor force. The spread across countries runs from under 10% to over 80%, and it is one of the strongest dividing lines between socioeconomic models. Historically the rate rose together with falling fertility and wider access to education.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.