Employment in agriculture — all countries

Employment in agriculture — Eritrea

Employment in agriculture in Eritrea in 2025 — 55.5%. Ranked 15 in the world out of 182. Since 1991, the indicator has fallen by 4 pp.

2025 55.5% −0.5 pp vs 2024
World rank 15of 182
Period maximum 60.2%1992
Period minimum 53.4%2002

Trend over time

1991–2025 · % of employment

Employment in agriculture — Eritrea, 1991–202552545658606219911995199920032007201120152019202320251991: 59.5%1992: 60.2%1993: 58.2%1994: 56.2%1995: 56.3%1996: 55.4%1997: 54.1%1998: 54.4%1999: 54.5%2000: 54.6%2001: 53.9%2002: 53.4%2003: 54.7%2004: 55%2005: 55.9%2006: 56.4%2007: 56.4%2008: 57.9%2009: 57.3%2010: 57.4%2011: 56.1%2012: 55.8%2013: 57.8%2014: 54.9%2015: 57.4%2016: 56.2%2017: 58%2018: 56.1%2019: 55.6%2020: 57%2021: 57.4%2022: 56.8%2023: 56.4%2024: 56%2025: 55.5%
Change over the period: −4 pp Annual average: -0.12 pp

Comparison, 2025

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Eritrea

Eritrea 55.5%
World 25.8%
Eastern Africa computed 60.4%
Low-income countries computed 58.5%
Employment in agriculture — Eritrea, by year Eritrea All countries CSV XLSX
Year % Change, pp
2025 55.5 −0.5 pp
2024 56 −0.4 pp
2023 56.4 −0.5 pp
2022 56.8 −0.6 pp
2021 57.4 +0.4 pp
2020 57 +1.4 pp
2019 55.6 −0.5 pp
2018 56.1 −1.9 pp
2017 58 +1.8 pp
2016 56.2 −1.2 pp
2015 57.4 +2.5 pp
2014 54.9 −2.9 pp
2013 57.8 +1.9 pp
2012 55.8 −0.3 pp
2011 56.1 −1.3 pp
2010 57.4 +0.1 pp
2009 57.3 −0.6 pp
2008 57.9 +1.5 pp
2007 56.4 −0 pp
2006 56.4 +0.5 pp
2005 55.9 +0.9 pp
2004 55 +0.3 pp
2003 54.7 +1.2 pp
2002 53.4 −0.4 pp
2001 53.9 −0.8 pp
2000 54.6 +0.2 pp
1999 54.5 +0 pp
1998 54.4 +0.3 pp
1997 54.1 −1.2 pp
1996 55.4 −0.9 pp
1995 56.3 +0.1 pp
1994 56.2 −2.1 pp
1993 58.2 −2 pp
1992 60.2 +0.7 pp
1991 59.5

About the indicator

The share of total employment in agriculture, forestry, hunting and fishing. Set against the share of agriculture in GDP it shows the productivity of the sector: if farming employs 50% of workers and produces 20% of GDP, labor productivity there is three times below the average for the economy.

Source: ILOSTAT (ILO), license CC BY 4.0.