Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Nepal

Bank branches in Nepal in 2024 — 23.82 per 100k. Ranked 29 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has risen by 854.5%.

2024 23.82 per 100k −0.84% vs 2023
World rank 29of 153
Period maximum 24.03 per 100k2023
Period minimum 2.45 per 100k2005

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Nepal, 2004–20240102030200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 2.5 per 100k2005: 2.45 per 100k2006: 2.5 per 100k2007: 3.45 per 100k2008: 3.44 per 100k2009: 4.53 per 100k2010: 5.01 per 100k2011: 7.18 per 100k2012: 8.3 per 100k2013: 8.35 per 100k2014: 8.59 per 100k2015: 9.14 per 100k2016: 10.05 per 100k2017: 12.1 per 100k2018: 15.74 per 100k2019: 18.27 per 100k2020: 21.9 per 100k2021: 22.83 per 100k2022: 23.72 per 100k2023: 24.03 per 100k2024: 23.82 per 100k
Change over the period: +21.33 (+854.48%) Average annual rate: 11.94 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Nepal

Nepal 23.82 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
South Asia 15.97 per 100k
Southern Asia computed 13.85 per 100k
Lower-middle-income countries computed 11.99 per 100k
Bank branches — Nepal, by year Nepal All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 23.82 −0.2 −0.84%
2023 24.03 +0.31 +1.29%
2022 23.72 +0.89 +3.91%
2021 22.83 +0.93 +4.23%
2020 21.9 +3.63 +19.88%
2019 18.27 +2.52 +16.04%
2018 15.74 +3.65 +30.16%
2017 12.1 +2.04 +20.32%
2016 10.05 +0.92 +10.04%
2015 9.14 +0.55 +6.4%
2014 8.59 +0.23 +2.8%
2013 8.35 +0.05 +0.65%
2012 8.3 +1.12 +15.57%
2011 7.18 +2.17 +43.27%
2010 5.01 +0.49 +10.72%
2009 4.53 +1.09 +31.75%
2008 3.44 −0.01 −0.39%
2007 3.45 +0.95 +37.75%
2006 2.5 +0.05 +2.21%
2005 2.45 −0.05 −1.86%
2004 2.5

Southern Asia, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.