Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Kazakhstan

Bank branches in Kazakhstan in 2022 — 12.19 per 100k. Ranked 86 in the world out of 167. Since 2004, the indicator has risen by 244.3%.

2022 12.19 per 100k −3.55% vs 2021
World rank 86of 167
Period maximum 14.75 per 100k2018
Period minimum 2.74 per 100k2017

Trend over time

2004–2022 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Kazakhstan, 2004–202205101520042006200820102012201420162018202020222004: 3.54 per 100k2005: 3.77 per 100k2006: 2.94 per 100k2007: 3.16 per 100k2008: 3.37 per 100k2009: 3.31 per 100k2010: 3.22 per 100k2011: 3.28 per 100k2012: 3.25 per 100k2013: 3.23 per 100k2014: 3.34 per 100k2015: 2.91 per 100k2016: 2.89 per 100k2017: 2.74 per 100k2018: 14.75 per 100k2019: 14.23 per 100k2020: 13.57 per 100k2021: 12.63 per 100k2022: 12.19 per 100k
Change over the period: +8.65 (+244.34%) Average annual rate: 7.11 %

Comparison, 2022

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Kazakhstan

Kazakhstan 12.19 per 100k
World 10.59 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 19.05 per 100k
Central Asia computed 30.44 per 100k
Upper-middle-income countries computed 10.57 per 100k
Bank branches — Kazakhstan, by year Kazakhstan All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2022 12.19 −0.45 −3.55%
2021 12.63 −0.93 −6.87%
2020 13.57 −0.67 −4.69%
2019 14.23 −0.52 −3.5%
2018 14.75 +12.01 +438.67%
2017 2.74 −0.16 −5.41%
2016 2.89 −0.02 −0.62%
2015 2.91 −0.42 −12.71%
2014 3.34 +0.11 +3.28%
2013 3.23 −0.02 −0.53%
2012 3.25 −0.03 −1.03%
2011 3.28 +0.07 +2.07%
2010 3.22 −0.1 −2.87%
2009 3.31 −0.06 −1.79%
2008 3.37 +0.21 +6.66%
2007 3.16 +0.22 +7.4%
2006 2.94 −0.82 −21.85%
2005 3.77 +0.23 +6.4%
2004 3.54

Central Asia, 2022

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.