Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Czechia

Bank branches in Czechia in 2024 — 14.63 per 100k. Ranked 63 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has fallen by 30.3%.

2024 14.63 per 100k −4.74% vs 2023
World rank 63of 153
Period maximum 24.36 per 100k2013
Period minimum 14.63 per 100k2024

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Czechia, 2004–202412.51517.52022.525200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 21 per 100k2005: 21.37 per 100k2006: 21.85 per 100k2007: 21.54 per 100k2008: 22.79 per 100k2009: 22.74 per 100k2010: 22.65 per 100k2011: 23.35 per 100k2012: 23.9 per 100k2013: 24.36 per 100k2014: 24.27 per 100k2015: 23.73 per 100k2016: 22.42 per 100k2017: 21.34 per 100k2018: 21.31 per 100k2019: 20.62 per 100k2020: 18.35 per 100k2021: 17.71 per 100k2022: 16.58 per 100k2023: 15.36 per 100k2024: 14.63 per 100k
Change over the period: −6.37 (−30.33%) Average annual rate: -1.79 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Czechia

Czechia 14.63 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Europe & Central Asia 18.97 per 100k
Eastern Europe computed 21.71 per 100k
Bank branches — Czechia, by year Czechia All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 14.63 −0.73 −4.74%
2023 15.36 −1.22 −7.35%
2022 16.58 −1.14 −6.42%
2021 17.71 −0.64 −3.47%
2020 18.35 −2.26 −10.98%
2019 20.62 −0.7 −3.27%
2018 21.31 −0.03 −0.14%
2017 21.34 −1.08 −4.81%
2016 22.42 −1.31 −5.51%
2015 23.73 −0.55 −2.25%
2014 24.27 −0.09 −0.36%
2013 24.36 +0.46 +1.94%
2012 23.9 +0.55 +2.35%
2011 23.35 +0.69 +3.07%
2010 22.65 −0.09 −0.4%
2009 22.74 −0.04 −0.19%
2008 22.79 +1.24 +5.76%
2007 21.54 −0.31 −1.4%
2006 21.85 +0.48 +2.25%
2005 21.37 +0.37 +1.76%
2004 21

Eastern Europe, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.