Bank branches — all countries

Bank branches — Botswana

Bank branches in Botswana in 2024 — 7.95 per 100k. Ranked 107 in the world out of 153. Since 2004, the indicator has risen by 18%.

2024 7.95 per 100k −9.8% vs 2023
World rank 107of 153
Period maximum 9.19 per 100k2019
Period minimum 6.4 per 100k2005

Trend over time

2004–2024 · per 100,000 adults

Bank branches — Botswana, 2004–2024678910200420062008201020122014201620182020202220242004: 6.74 per 100k2005: 6.4 per 100k2006: 6.74 per 100k2007: 7.7 per 100k2008: 8.61 per 100k2009: 8.56 per 100k2010: 8.88 per 100k2011: 8.48 per 100k2012: 8.57 per 100k2013: 8.82 per 100k2014: 9.06 per 100k2015: 8.43 per 100k2016: 8.7 per 100k2017: 8.08 per 100k2018: 9.04 per 100k2019: 9.19 per 100k2020: 8.88 per 100k2021: 7.41 per 100k2022: 8.31 per 100k2023: 8.81 per 100k2024: 7.95 per 100k
Change over the period: +1.21 (+17.98%) Average annual rate: 0.83 %

Comparison, 2024

How the value compares with the world and the groups this territory belongs to: Botswana

Botswana 7.95 per 100k
World 11.12 per 100k
Sub-Saharan Africa 4.01 per 100k
Southern Africa computed 7.8 per 100k
Upper-middle-income countries computed 10.22 per 100k
Bank branches — Botswana, by year Botswana All countries CSV XLSX
Year per 100k Change Change, %
2024 7.95 −0.86 −9.8%
2023 8.81 +0.5 +6.05%
2022 8.31 +0.9 +12.1%
2021 7.41 −1.47 −16.51%
2020 8.88 −0.31 −3.38%
2019 9.19 +0.15 +1.61%
2018 9.04 +0.96 +11.92%
2017 8.08 −0.62 −7.15%
2016 8.7 +0.27 +3.18%
2015 8.43 −0.62 −6.85%
2014 9.06 +0.23 +2.62%
2013 8.82 +0.25 +2.94%
2012 8.57 +0.09 +1.09%
2011 8.48 −0.4 −4.49%
2010 8.88 +0.32 +3.77%
2009 8.56 −0.05 −0.63%
2008 8.61 +0.91 +11.82%
2007 7.7 +0.96 +14.25%
2006 6.74 +0.34 +5.28%
2005 6.4 −0.33 −4.97%
2004 6.74

Southern Africa, 2024

The same indicator for neighboring countries — with links to their pages

About the indicator

The number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 adults. The indicator was conceived as a measure of access to financial services, but it now calls for care in reading: in countries where banking has moved onto the phone, branches are closing, and a falling value means not a loss of access but a change in its form. The clearest case is Kenya and other countries of East Africa, where mobile money reached the population bypassing branches altogether.

Important: A measure of the physical presence of banks, not of access to financial services. Where mobile payments are widespread, a low value does not indicate financial exclusion.

Source: World Development Indicators (World Bank), license CC BY 4.0.