OpenAI

o3 Mini 2025-01-31

Type
language model
Context
200K tokens
Max output
100K
API string
azure/eu/o3-mini-2025-01-31

Prices by provider

Provider Input, $ per 1M Output, $ per 1M In our data since
Microsoft Foundry azure/o3-mini-2025-01-31 $1.1 $4.4 31 Jul 2026
OpenAI $1.1 $4.4 31 Jul 2026
Microsoft Foundry azure/eu/o3-mini-2025-01-31 $1.21 $4.84 31 Jul 2026

Only the base tier and only per-token prices are shown. Batch, discounted and cached rates, as well as prices per image or per second of video, do not go into this table: they cannot stand in the same column as a price per million tokens.

A single provider appears several times if it sells this model under different identifiers and at different prices — for example, at different weight precision. The identifier is shown next to the name. Identical offers that arrived from two sources under different spellings are merged into one row.

The date in the last column is the day this price first entered our collection. The price may well be older: before that day we simply were not recording it. It has not changed since — otherwise a new row with a new date would stand in its place.

Measurement results

Task set Result Run conditions Measured by
MATH, difficulty level five 96.49 % effort: high · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
Mock AIME 2024–2025 — olympiad problems 76.92 % effort: low · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
GPQA Diamond — graduate-level questions 69.36 % effort: low · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
Creative writing (Lech Mazur’s evaluation) 61.7 % effort: high lechmazur/writing Github repository
Aider Polyglot — code edits in six languages 60.4 % effort: medium · with a tuned harness Aider LLM Leaderboards
CadEval — building CAD models with code 54 % effort: medium CadEval Dashboard
Fiction.LiveBench — holding a long context 50 % effort: medium Fiction.live leaderboard
WeirdML — unusual machine learning tasks 43.7 % effort: high WeirdML Leaderboard
ARC-AGI — generalising to unseen patterns 34.5 % effort: high · with a tuned harness ARC Prize Leaderboard
Cybench — cybersecurity tasks 22.5 % effort: medium · with a tuned harness Cybench leaderboard
FrontierMath, levels 1–3 18.6 % effort: high Epoch evaluations
Chess puzzles 12.67 % effort: low Epoch evaluations
SimpleBench — trick questions 7.36 % effort: high SimpleBench Leaderboard
ARC-AGI-2 2.99 % effort: high
GSO-Bench — code optimisation 1.3 % effort: low GSO Leaderboard
FrontierMath, level 4 — research-grade problems 0 % effort: high Epoch evaluations