OpenAI

GPT 5 Mini 2025-08-07

Type
language model
Context
272K tokens
Max output
128K
API string
azure/eu/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Prices by provider

Provider Input, $ per 1M Output, $ per 1M In our data since
Microsoft Foundry azure/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 $0.25 $2 31 Jul 2026
OpenAI $0.25 $2 31 Jul 2026
Microsoft Foundry azure/eu/gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 $0.275 $2.2 31 Jul 2026

Only the base tier and only per-token prices are shown. Batch, discounted and cached rates, as well as prices per image or per second of video, do not go into this table: they cannot stand in the same column as a price per million tokens.

A single provider appears several times if it sells this model under different identifiers and at different prices — for example, at different weight precision. The identifier is shown next to the name. Identical offers that arrived from two sources under different spellings are merged into one row.

The date in the last column is the day this price first entered our collection. The price may well be older: before that day we simply were not recording it. It has not changed since — otherwise a new row with a new date would stand in its place.

Measurement results

Task set Result Run conditions Measured by
MATH, difficulty level five 97.85 % effort: high · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
Mock AIME 2024–2025 — olympiad problems 86.65 % effort: high · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
Creative writing (Lech Mazur’s evaluation) 83.1 % effort: medium lechmazur/writing Github repository
Fiction.LiveBench — holding a long context 69.4 % effort: medium Fiction.live leaderboard
GPQA Diamond — graduate-level questions 66.67 % effort: high · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
SWE-bench Verified — fixing bugs in repositories 64.67 % effort: medium · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
ARC-AGI — generalising to unseen patterns 54.33 % effort: high · with a tuned harness
WeirdML — unusual machine learning tasks 52.67 % effort: high WeirdML Leaderboard
FrontierMath, levels 1–3 46.67 % effort: high Epoch evaluations
Terminal-Bench — working in the command line 34.8 % · with a tuned harness https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
SimpleQA Verified — factual accuracy 21 % effort: high Epoch evaluations
Humanity’s Last Exam — expert-level questions 15.38 %
FrontierMath, level 4 — research-grade problems 12.2 % effort: high Epoch evaluations
ARC-AGI-2 4.44 % effort: high
CritPt — physics problems 0 %