azure/eu/gpt-5-2025-08-07| Provider | Input, $ per 1M | Output, $ per 1M | In our data since |
|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft Foundry
azure/gpt-5-2025-08-07
|
$1.25 | $10 | 31 Jul 2026 |
| OpenAI | $1.25 | $10 | 31 Jul 2026 |
Microsoft Foundry
azure/eu/gpt-5-2025-08-07
|
$1.375 | $11 | 31 Jul 2026 |
Only the base tier and only per-token prices are shown. Batch, discounted and cached rates, as well as prices per image or per second of video, do not go into this table: they cannot stand in the same column as a price per million tokens.
A single provider appears several times if it sells this model under different identifiers and at different prices — for example, at different weight precision. The identifier is shown next to the name. Identical offers that arrived from two sources under different spellings are merged into one row.
The date in the last column is the day this price first entered our collection. The price may well be older: before that day we simply were not recording it. It has not changed since — otherwise a new row with a new date would stand in its place.
| Task set | Result | Run conditions | Measured by |
|---|---|---|---|
| MATH, difficulty level five | 98.13 % | effort: high · with a tuned harness | Epoch evaluations |
| Fiction.LiveBench — holding a long context | 97.2 % | effort: medium | Fiction.live leaderboard |
| Mock AIME 2024–2025 — olympiad problems | 91.38 % | effort: minimal · with a tuned harness | Epoch evaluations |
| Aider Polyglot — code edits in six languages | 88 % | effort: low · with a tuned harness | Aider LLM Leaderboards |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur’s evaluation) | 86 % | effort: medium | lechmazur/writing Github repository |
| GPQA Diamond — graduate-level questions | 81.57 % | effort: minimal · with a tuned harness | Epoch evaluations |
| GeoBench — locating a place from a photograph | 81 % | effort: medium | GeoBench leaderboard |
| SWE-bench Verified — fixing bugs in repositories | 73.55 % | effort: high · with a tuned harness | Epoch evaluations |
| ARC-AGI — generalising to unseen patterns | 65.7 % | effort: high · with a tuned harness | ARC Prize Leaderboard |
| WeirdML — unusual machine learning tasks | 60.7 % | effort: high | WeirdML Leaderboard |
| FrontierMath, levels 1–3 | 55.44 % | effort: high | Epoch evaluations |
| DeepResearch Bench — deep research | 55.13 % | — | DeepResearchBench Leaderboard |
| SimpleQA Verified — factual accuracy | 50.6 % | effort: high | Epoch evaluations |
| Terminal-Bench — working in the command line | 49.6 % | · with a tuned harness | Terminal-Bench v2 Leaderboard |
| SimpleBench — trick questions | 48.04 % | effort: high | SimpleBench Leaderboard |
| GDPval — tasks from real occupations | 34.8 % | effort: medium | — |
| Chess puzzles | 33.71 % | effort: minimal | Epoch evaluations |
| BALROG — game environments | 32.8 % | effort: minimal | Balrog Leaderboard |
| FrontierMath, level 4 — research-grade problems | 21.95 % | effort: high | Epoch evaluations |
| Humanity’s Last Exam — expert-level questions | 21.56 % | effort: high | — |
| APEX-Agents | 18.3 % | effort: high | — |
| CritPt — physics problems | 12.6 % | effort: high | — |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 9.86 % | effort: high | — |
| GSO-Bench — code optimisation | 6.9 % | effort: high | GSO Leaderboard |
| Remote Labor Index — jobs from a freelance marketplace | 1.67 % | — | — |