Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.7

Type
language model
Context
1,000K tokens
Max output
128K
Released
16 April 2026
Knowledge cutoff
January 2026
API string
anthropic/claude-opus-4-7

Prices by provider

Provider Input, $ per 1M Output, $ per 1M In our data since
Kilo Code stealth/claude-opus-4.7 $4 $20 31 Jul 2026
Poe $4.3 $21 31 Jul 2026
GMI Cloud $4.5 $22.5 31 Jul 2026
NanoGPT $4.998 $25.007 31 Jul 2026
neon $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
frogbot $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
auriko $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
google-vertex-anthropic $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
freemodel $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
perplexity-agent $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
hpc-ai $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
302.AI $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
AIHubMix $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Abacus.AI $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Amazon Bedrock anthropic.claude-opus-4-7 $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Anthropic $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Cloudflare AI Gateway $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
CrossModel $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Databricks $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
DigitalOcean Gradient AI $5 $25 1 Aug 2026
GitHub Copilot $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Google Vertex AI $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Kilo Code anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
LLM Gateway $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Merge Gateway $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Microsoft Foundry $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
NEAR AI $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
OpenCode Zen $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
OpenRouter $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
OrcaRouter $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Pioneer $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
SAP AI Core $5 $25 1 Aug 2026
Vercel $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
ZenMux $5 $25 31 Jul 2026
Amazon Bedrock au.anthropic.claude-opus-4-7 $5.5 $27.5 31 Jul 2026
Venice AI $6 $30 31 Jul 2026

Only the base tier and only per-token prices are shown. Batch, discounted and cached rates, as well as prices per image or per second of video, do not go into this table: they cannot stand in the same column as a price per million tokens.

A single provider appears several times if it sells this model under different identifiers and at different prices — for example, at different weight precision. The identifier is shown next to the name. Identical offers that arrived from two sources under different spellings are merged into one row.

The date in the last column is the day this price first entered our collection. The price may well be older: before that day we simply were not recording it. It has not changed since — otherwise a new row with a new date would stand in its place.

Measurement results

Task set Result Run conditions Measured by
Arena Score, web development 1,560.63 1,554–1,567
Arena Score, expert questions 1,522.22 1,513–1,531
Arena Score, programming 1,516.56 1,510–1,523
Arena Score, multi-turn dialogue 1,506.02 1,499–1,514
Arena Score in French 1,499.99 1,484–1,516
Arena Score, hard prompts 1,498.15 1,493–1,503
Arena Score, long queries 1,497.48 1,492–1,503
Arena Score, mathematics 1,488.38 1,476–1,500
Arena Score in English 1,487.52 1,482–1,493
Arena Score in Russian 1,487.11 1,478–1,496
Arena Score, instruction following 1,485.87 1,480–1,492
Arena Score, overall 1,481.85 1,478–1,486
Arena Score, creative writing 1,476.58 1,469–1,484
Arena Score in Spanish 1,473.23 1,457–1,489
Arena Score, understanding diagrams 1,336.97 1,327–1,347
Arena Score, text recognition in images 1,323.66 1,317–1,331
Arena Score, working with images 1,314.84 1,308–1,322
Mock AIME 2024–2025 — olympiad problems 97.8 % effort: xhigh · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
ARC-AGI — generalising to unseen patterns 93.5 % effort: high · with a tuned harness https://arcprize.org/leaderboard
Terminal-Bench — working in the command line 90.2 % · with a tuned harness https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
GPQA Diamond — graduate-level questions 86.87 % effort: xhigh · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
SWE-bench Verified — fixing bugs in repositories 83.47 % effort: max · with a tuned harness Epoch evaluations
WeirdML — unusual machine learning tasks 76.4 % https://htihle.github.io/weirdml.html
ARC-AGI-2 75.8 % effort: max
FrontierMath, levels 1–3 70.18 % effort: max Epoch evaluations
CursorBench — edits in the editor 64.8 % effort: max https://cursor.com/cursorbench
SimpleBench — trick questions 55.48 % SimpleBench Leaderboard
SimpleQA Verified — factual accuracy 50.6 % effort: xhigh Epoch evaluations
GSO-Bench — code optimisation 44.12 % GSO Leaderboard
FrontierCode — patches fit to be merged into a project 38.5 % https://cognition.com/frontiercode
APEX-Agents 33.9 % effort: max
Humanity’s Last Exam — expert-level questions 32.98 %
FrontierMath, level 4 — research-grade problems 31.71 % effort: max Epoch evaluations
Chess puzzles 26.35 % effort: low Epoch evaluations
OSWorld 2.0 — working inside an operating system 18.2 % effort: max https://osworld-v2.xlang.ai/ self-reported
CritPt — physics problems 12 % effort: max
Arena Score, agent tasks 0.07 0–0